Literature DB >> 26833979

Efficacy evaluation of D-dimer and modified criteria in overt and nonovert disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnosis.

W J Li1, M Sha1, W Ma1, Z P Zhang1, Y J Wu1, D M Shi1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: D-dimer (D-D) was shown to be an important indicator for the diagnosis of overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and nonovert DIC. However, its diagnostic cutoff value in the clinic is not clearly defined.
METHODS: D-D, fibrinogen degradation products (FDP), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), fibrinogen (Fg), thrombin time (TT), antithrombin (AT), and blood platelet count (PLT) of 360 cases were used to assess the diagnostic efficacy of D-D (InnovanceR reagent) for the diagnosis of DIC and nonovert DIC, compared to, or combined with, other DIC coagulation indicators.
RESULTS: When D-D > 3.0 μg/mL was used as the cutoff, the sum of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity reached maximum values for DIC and nonovert DIC, whereas the sum of misdiagnoses and missed diagnosis rate was minimal. Excluding D-D, AT, or Fg, but not TT, from the test combination reduced the diagnostic sensitivity of DIC or nonovert DIC by various degrees. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of D-D for diagnosing DIC and nonovert DIC was 0.97 and 0.98, respectively. Combining two factors, D-D > 3.0 μg/mL and FDP > 10 mg/L, increased the sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of DIC and nonovert DIC.
CONCLUSION: The cutoff value of D-D is >3.0 μg/mL; combined testing of D-D and FDP could be used as primary screening for diagnosing DIC and nonovert DIC in clinical practice.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  D-dimer (D-D); Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC); area under curve (AUC); diagnosis; fibrin fibrinogen degradation products (FDP)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26833979     DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.12467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol        ISSN: 1751-5521            Impact factor:   2.877


  5 in total

1.  Diagnostic Value of Serum D-Dimer for Detection of Gallbladder Carcinoma.

Authors:  Weihao Kong; Li Zhang; Ran An; Mingwei Yang; Hao Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.989

2.  Evaluation of Prognosis and Risk of Death by Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio, C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio and Plasma D-Dimer in Patients with Pulmonary Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Tiantian Shan; Xinran Li; Min Yan; Xiangtao Pan
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-12-01

3.  Machine learning-based diagnosis for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC): Development, external validation, and comparison to scoring systems.

Authors:  Jihoon G Yoon; JoonNyung Heo; Minkyu Kim; Yu Jin Park; Min Hyuk Choi; Jaewoo Song; Kangsan Wyi; Hakbeen Kim; Olivier Duchenne; Soowon Eom; Yury Tsoy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  D-dimer specificity and clinical context: an old unlearned story.

Authors:  Matteo Marin; Daniele Orso; Nicola Federici; Luigi Vetrugno; Tiziana Bove
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Identification of molecular markers for pre-thrombotic state: validation in the rabbits with tibia fracture or lung cancer.

Authors:  Yan Qi; Xin Hu; Jing Chen; Qian Wu; Xiaobin Ying; Yan Shi
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.