BACKGROUND: A prophylactic HIV-1 vaccine is a global health priority. OBJECTIVE: To assess a novel vaccine platform as a prophylactic HIV-1 regimen. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Both participants and study personnel were blinded to treatment allocation. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01215149). SETTING: United States, East Africa, and South Africa. PATIENTS: Healthy adults without HIV infection. INTERVENTION: 2 HIV-1 vaccines (adenovirus serotype 26 with an HIV-1 envelope A insert [Ad26.EnvA] and adenovirus serotype 35 with an HIV-1 envelope A insert [Ad35.Env], both administered at a dose of 5 × 1010 viral particles) in homologous and heterologous combinations. MEASUREMENTS: Safety and immunogenicity and the effect of baseline vector immunity. RESULTS: 217 participants received at least 1 vaccination, and 210 (>96%) completed follow-up. No vaccine-associated serious adverse events occurred. All regimens were generally well-tolerated. All regimens elicited humoral and cellular immune responses in nearly all participants. Preexisting Ad26- or Ad35-neutralizing antibody titers had no effect on vaccine safety and little effect on immunogenicity. In both homologous and heterologous regimens, the second vaccination significantly increased EnvA antibody titers (approximately 20-fold from the median enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay titers of 30-300 to 3000). The heterologous regimen of Ad26-Ad35 elicited significantly higher EnvA antibody titers than Ad35-Ad26. T-cell responses were modest and lower in East Africa than in South Africa and the United States. LIMITATIONS: Because the 2 envelope inserts were not identical, the boosting responses were complex to interpret. Durability of the immune responses elicited beyond 1 year is unknown. CONCLUSION: Both vaccines elicited significant immune responses in all populations. Baseline vector immunity did not significantly affect responses. Second vaccinations in all regimens significantly boosted EnvA antibody titers, although vaccine order in the heterologous regimen had a modest effect on the immune response. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, National Institutes of Health, Ragon Institute, Crucell Holland.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: A prophylactic HIV-1 vaccine is a global health priority. OBJECTIVE: To assess a novel vaccine platform as a prophylactic HIV-1 regimen. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Both participants and study personnel were blinded to treatment allocation. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01215149). SETTING: United States, East Africa, and South Africa. PATIENTS: Healthy adults without HIV infection. INTERVENTION: 2 HIV-1 vaccines (adenovirus serotype 26 with an HIV-1 envelope A insert [Ad26.EnvA] and adenovirus serotype 35 with an HIV-1 envelope A insert [Ad35.Env], both administered at a dose of 5 × 1010 viral particles) in homologous and heterologous combinations. MEASUREMENTS: Safety and immunogenicity and the effect of baseline vector immunity. RESULTS: 217 participants received at least 1 vaccination, and 210 (>96%) completed follow-up. No vaccine-associated serious adverse events occurred. All regimens were generally well-tolerated. All regimens elicited humoral and cellular immune responses in nearly all participants. Preexisting Ad26- or Ad35-neutralizing antibody titers had no effect on vaccine safety and little effect on immunogenicity. In both homologous and heterologous regimens, the second vaccination significantly increased EnvA antibody titers (approximately 20-fold from the median enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay titers of 30-300 to 3000). The heterologous regimen of Ad26-Ad35 elicited significantly higher EnvA antibody titers than Ad35-Ad26. T-cell responses were modest and lower in East Africa than in South Africa and the United States. LIMITATIONS: Because the 2 envelope inserts were not identical, the boosting responses were complex to interpret. Durability of the immune responses elicited beyond 1 year is unknown. CONCLUSION: Both vaccines elicited significant immune responses in all populations. Baseline vector immunity did not significantly affect responses. Second vaccinations in all regimens significantly boosted EnvA antibody titers, although vaccine order in the heterologous regimen had a modest effect on the immune response. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, National Institutes of Health, Ragon Institute, Crucell Holland.
Authors: Helen Horton; Evan P Thomas; Jason A Stucky; Ian Frank; Zoe Moodie; Yunda Huang; Ya-Lin Chiu; M Juliana McElrath; Stephen C De Rosa Journal: J Immunol Methods Date: 2007-04-03 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Neil M Flynn; Donald N Forthal; Clayton D Harro; Franklyn N Judson; Kenneth H Mayer; Michael F Para Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2005-01-27 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Ouzama Nicholson; Fay DiCandilo; James Kublin; Xiao Sun; Erin Quirk; Michelle Miller; Glenda Gray; Jean Pape; Michael N Robertson; Devan V Mehrotra; Steven Self; Katherine Turner; Jorge Sanchez; Punnee Pitisuttithum; Ann Duerr; Sheri Dubey; Lisa Kierstead; Danilo Casimiro; Scott M Hammer For The Merck V/Hiv Vaccine Trials Network Study Team Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2010-11-23 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Andrew T Catanzaro; Richard A Koup; Mario Roederer; Robert T Bailer; Mary E Enama; Zoe Moodie; Lin Gu; Julie E Martin; Laura Novik; Bimal K Chakrabarti; Bryan T Butman; Jason G D Gall; C Richter King; Charla A Andrews; Rebecca Sheets; Phillip L Gomez; John R Mascola; Gary J Nabel; Barney S Graham Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2006-11-08 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Thomas W Geisbert; Michael Bailey; Lisa Hensley; Clement Asiedu; Joan Geisbert; Daphne Stanley; Anna Honko; Joshua Johnson; Sabue Mulangu; Maria Grazia Pau; Jerome Custers; Jort Vellinga; Jenny Hendriks; Peter Jahrling; Mario Roederer; Jaap Goudsmit; Richard Koup; Nancy J Sullivan Journal: J Virol Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Katarina Radosevic; Ariane Rodriguez; Angelique A C Lemckert; Marjolein van der Meer; Gert Gillissen; Carolien Warnar; Rie von Eyben; Maria Grazia Pau; Jaap Goudsmit Journal: Clin Vaccine Immunol Date: 2010-09-08
Authors: Scott M Hammer; Magdalena E Sobieszczyk; Holly Janes; Shelly T Karuna; Mark J Mulligan; Doug Grove; Beryl A Koblin; Susan P Buchbinder; Michael C Keefer; Georgia D Tomaras; Nicole Frahm; John Hural; Chuka Anude; Barney S Graham; Mary E Enama; Elizabeth Adams; Edwin DeJesus; Richard M Novak; Ian Frank; Carter Bentley; Shelly Ramirez; Rong Fu; Richard A Koup; John R Mascola; Gary J Nabel; David C Montefiori; James Kublin; M Juliana McElrath; Lawrence Corey; Peter B Gilbert Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: T Christopher Mast; Lisa Kierstead; Swati B Gupta; Alexander A Nikas; Esper G Kallas; Vladimir Novitsky; Bernard Mbewe; Punee Pitisuttithum; Mauro Schechter; Eftyhia Vardas; Nathan D Wolfe; Miguel Aste-Amezaga; Danilo R Casimiro; Paul Coplan; Walter L Straus; John W Shiver Journal: Vaccine Date: 2009-11-17 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Frances H Priddy; Deborah Brown; James Kublin; Kathleen Monahan; David P Wright; Jacob Lalezari; Steven Santiago; Michael Marmor; Michelle Lally; Richard M Novak; Stephen J Brown; Priya Kulkarni; Sheri A Dubey; Lisa S Kierstead; Danilo R Casimiro; Robin Mogg; Mark J DiNubile; John W Shiver; Randi Y Leavitt; Michael N Robertson; Devan V Mehrotra; Erin Quirk Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2008-06-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Jan Medlock; Abhishek Pandey; Alyssa S Parpia; Amber Tang; Laura A Skrip; Alison P Galvani Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-03-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Dariusz K Murakowski; John P Barton; Lauren Peter; Abishek Chandrashekar; Esther Bondzie; Ang Gao; Dan H Barouch; Arup K Chakraborty Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Lindsey R Baden; Stephen R Walsh; Michael S Seaman; Yehuda Z Cohen; Jennifer A Johnson; J Humberto Licona; Rachel D Filter; Jane A Kleinjan; Jon A Gothing; Julia Jennings; Lauren Peter; Joseph Nkolola; Peter Abbink; Erica N Borducchi; Marinela Kirilova; Kathryn E Stephenson; Poonam Pegu; Michael A Eller; Hung V Trinh; Mangala Rao; Julie A Ake; Michal Sarnecki; Steven Nijs; Katleen Callewaert; Hanneke Schuitemaker; Jenny Hendriks; Maria G Pau; Frank Tomaka; Bette T Korber; Galit Alter; Raphael Dolin; Patricia L Earl; Bernard Moss; Nelson L Michael; Merlin L Robb; Dan H Barouch Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2018-07-13 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Dan H Barouch; Frank L Tomaka; Frank Wegmann; Daniel J Stieh; Galit Alter; Merlin L Robb; Nelson L Michael; Lauren Peter; Joseph P Nkolola; Erica N Borducchi; Abishek Chandrashekar; David Jetton; Kathryn E Stephenson; Wenjun Li; Bette Korber; Georgia D Tomaras; David C Montefiori; Glenda Gray; Nicole Frahm; M Juliana McElrath; Lindsey Baden; Jennifer Johnson; Julia Hutter; Edith Swann; Etienne Karita; Hannah Kibuuka; Juliet Mpendo; Nigel Garrett; Kathy Mngadi; Kundai Chinyenze; Frances Priddy; Erica Lazarus; Fatima Laher; Sorachai Nitayapan; Punnee Pitisuttithum; Stephan Bart; Thomas Campbell; Robert Feldman; Gregg Lucksinger; Caroline Borremans; Katleen Callewaert; Raphaele Roten; Jerald Sadoff; Lorenz Scheppler; Mo Weijtens; Karin Feddes-de Boer; Daniëlle van Manen; Jessica Vreugdenhil; Roland Zahn; Ludo Lavreys; Steven Nijs; Jeroen Tolboom; Jenny Hendriks; Zelda Euler; Maria G Pau; Hanneke Schuitemaker Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-07-06 Impact factor: 79.321