Literature DB >> 26833043

Ovarian cancer patients at high risk of BRCA mutation: the constitutional genetic characterization does not change prognosis.

Renaud Sabatier1,2,3, Elise Lavit4, Jessica Moretta5, Eric Lambaudie6,7, Tetsuro Noguchi8, François Eisinger5, Elisabeth Cherau7, Magali Provansal4, Doriane Livon5, Laetitia Rabayrol5, Cornel Popovici8, Emmanuelle Charaffe-Jauffret6,9,10, Hagay Sobol9,8, Patrice Viens4,6,9.   

Abstract

Ovarian neoplasms secondary to germline BRCA mutations had been described to have a more favourable survival. There is only few data concerning the prognosis of non mutated patients presenting clinical features evocative of BRCA alterations. We retrospectively collected data from patients treated in our institution for an invasive ovarian carcinoma between 1995 and 2011. Patients considered at high risk of BRCA mutation were tested for BRCA1/2 germline mutations. We described clinical, pathological and therapeutic features and compared prognosis of BRCA mutation carriers and non-mutated patients. Out of 617 ovarian cancer patients, we identified 104 patients who were considered at high risk of mutation. The 33 mutated patients were more likely to present a personal (33 vs. 10 %, p = 0.003) or a family (42 vs. 24 %, p = 0.06) history of breast/ovarian cancers. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and wild type patients displayed similar prognosis: median progression-free survival (PFS) of 20.9 versus 37.7 months (p = 0.21); median overall survival (OS) of 151.2 versus 122.5 months (p = 0.52). Personal history of breast cancer increased both PFS [HR = 0.45 (95CI 0.25-0.81)] and OS [HR = 0.35 (95CI 0.16-0.75)]. In multivariate analysis, this parameter was an independent prognostic feature, whereas the identification of a BRCA1/2 mutation was not. In our cohort, all patients at high risk of BRCA mutation share a similar prognosis, whatever is their germline mutation status. Prognosis seems to be more influenced by clinical history than by germline mutations identification. If it is confirmed in larger and independent series, this result suggests that the hypothesis of other BRCA pathway alterations (BRCAness phenotype) deserves to be deeply explored.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA; Mutation; Ovarian cancer; Prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26833043     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9873-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  69 in total

1.  Inactivation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Hilton; John P Geisler; Jennifer A Rathe; Melanie A Hattermann-Zogg; Barry DeYoung; Richard E Buller
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-09-18       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  A new scoring system for the chances of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation outperforms existing models including BRCAPRO.

Authors:  D G R Evans; D M Eccles; N Rahman; K Young; M Bulman; E Amir; A Shenton; A Howell; F Lalloo
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 3.  Hereditary ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jaime Prat; Adriana Ribé; Alberto Gallardo
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  "BRCAness" syndrome in ovarian cancer: a case-control study describing the clinical features and outcome of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  David S P Tan; Christian Rothermundt; Karen Thomas; Elizabeth Bancroft; Rosalind Eeles; Susan Shanley; Audrey Ardern-Jones; Andrew Norman; Stanley B Kaye; Martin E Gore
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  BRCA mutation frequency and patterns of treatment response in BRCA mutation-positive women with ovarian cancer: a report from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  Kathryn Alsop; Sian Fereday; Cliff Meldrum; Anna deFazio; Catherine Emmanuel; Joshy George; Alexander Dobrovic; Michael J Birrer; Penelope M Webb; Colin Stewart; Michael Friedlander; Stephen Fox; David Bowtell; Gillian Mitchell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  BRCAness: finding the Achilles heel in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Georgios Rigakos; Evangelia Razis
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-06-06

7.  Effect of BRCA1/2 mutations on long-term survival of patients with invasive ovarian cancer: the national Israeli study of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Angela Chetrit; Galit Hirsh-Yechezkel; Yehuda Ben-David; Flora Lubin; Eitan Friedman; Siegal Sadetzki
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Hallmarks of 'BRCAness' in sporadic cancers.

Authors:  Nicholas Turner; Andrew Tutt; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Integrated analysis of germline and somatic variants in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Krishna L Kanchi; Kimberly J Johnson; Charles Lu; Michael D McLellan; Mark D M Leiserson; Michael C Wendl; Qunyuan Zhang; Daniel C Koboldt; Mingchao Xie; Cyriac Kandoth; Joshua F McMichael; Matthew A Wyczalkowski; David E Larson; Heather K Schmidt; Christopher A Miller; Robert S Fulton; Paul T Spellman; Elaine R Mardis; Todd E Druley; Timothy A Graubert; Paul J Goodfellow; Benjamin J Raphael; Richard K Wilson; Li Ding
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 10.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Jan P Vandenbroucke; Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Cynthia D Mulrow; Stuart J Pocock; Charles Poole; James J Schlesselman; Matthias Egger
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of Survival Outcomes According to BRCA1/2 Variant Type in High-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Juhun Lee; Jong Mi Kim; Yoon Hee Lee; Gun Oh Chong; Nan Young Lee; In Hee Lee; Ji Young Park; Dae Gy Hong
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 2.  Prognostic significance of BRCA mutations in ovarian cancer: an updated systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai Xu; Shouhua Yang; Yingchao Zhao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.