| Literature DB >> 26832921 |
Sarah Hescham1,2, Yasin Temel3,4,5, Sandra Schipper3,6,5, Mélanie Lagiere3,5, Lisa-Maria Schönfeld3,7,5, Arjan Blokland8,5, Ali Jahanshahi3,5.
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established symptomatic treatment modality for movement disorders and constitutes an emerging therapeutic approach for the treatment of memory impairment. In line with this, fornix DBS has shown to ameliorate cognitive decline associated with dementia. Nonetheless, mechanisms mediating clinical effects in demented patients or patients with other neurological disorders are largely unknown. There is evidence that DBS is able to modulate neurophysiological activity in targeted brain regions. We therefore hypothesized that DBS might be able to influence cognitive function via activity-dependent regulation of hippocampal neurogenesis. Using stimulation parameters, which were validated to restore memory loss in a previous behavioral study, we here assessed long-term effects of fornix DBS. To do so, we injected the thymidine analog, 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU), after DBS and perfused the animals 6.5 weeks later. A week prior to perfusion, memory performance was assessed in the water maze. We found that acute stimulation of the fornix improved spatial memory performance in the water maze when the probe trial was performed 1 h after the last training session. However, no evidence for stimulation-induced neurogenesis was found in fornix DBS rats when compared to sham. Our results suggest that fornix DBS improves memory functions independent of hippocampal neurogenesis, possibly through other mechanisms such as synaptic plasticity and acute neurotransmitter release.Entities:
Keywords: Deep brain stimulation; Fornix; Hippocampus; Memory; Neurogenesis
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26832921 PMCID: PMC5334384 DOI: 10.1007/s00429-016-1188-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Struct Funct ISSN: 1863-2653 Impact factor: 3.270
Fig. 1Timeline of the experimental procedures expressed in days. One week following surgery, fornix DBS rats (n = 10) received stimulation for 4 h, while sham rats (n = 7) were only attached to cables and not stimulated. BrdU injections were given 3 days later twice per day for a period of 3 days. Morris water maze (MWM) testing included training, probe trials and reversal training and all rats were sacrificed the following day
Fig. 2Illustrative coronal section showing the histological verification of the electrode location in the vicinity of the fornix (scale bar 500 μm). 3V, third ventricle
Fig. 3Acquisition trials of fornix DBS and sham animals. No difference in the latency to find the platform was found between the groups. Data represent mean ± S.E.M
Fig. 4Effects of fornix DBS during the different probe trials (after 1 or 48 h delay and in the probe trial 1 h after the reversal training) when compared to sham. There was no difference between the groups in time spent in the target annulus (a). Fornix DBS rats, however, crossed the target annulus more often than sham animals (b). Asterisk indicates p < 0.05. Data represent mean ± S.E.M
Fig. 5Representative picture (scale bar 500 µm) of a hippocampal section stained for NeuN (red) and BrdU (green) with a high-power inset at the top right showing a double-labeled cell (scale bar 50 µm). Graph represents number of double-labeled BrdU/NeuN cells in the dentate gyrus expressed as percentage of sham ± S.E.M. There was no significant difference between the groups