Literature DB >> 26832832

The Pathogenesis of Implant-Related Reactive Lesions: A Clinical, Histologic and Polarized Light Microscopy Study.

Michal Halperin-Sternfeld1, Edmond Sabo2,3, Sharon Akrish2,3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peri-implant soft tissue reactive lesions (I-RLs) may jeopardize implant success and survival. To the best of the authors' knowledge, its pathogenesis is unknown. The objective of this study is to conduct a clinicopathologic and polarized light microscopy (PLM) analysis of 14 new I-RLs and compare them with comparable tooth-associated cases (T-RLs) to better understand I-RL pathogenesis.
METHODS: Fifty-eight new cases of I-RL and T-RL were retrieved from the pathology department archives of Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel. Retrospective analysis of histopathologic and clinical features was conducted, documented, and then compared for: 1) I-RL (n = 14), 2) peri-implant pyogenic granuloma (I-PG) (n = 5), 3) peri-implant peripheral giant cell granuloma (I-PGCG) (n = 9), 4) T-RL (n = 44), 5) tooth-associated pyogenic granuloma (T-PG) (n = 21), and 6) tooth-associated peripheral giant cell granuloma (T-PGCG) (n = 23). Presence of foreign bodies was assessed using PLM.
RESULTS: Foreign bodies were found more commonly in I-RLs (n = 13/14; 93%) when compared with T-RLs (n = 18/44; 41%), which was a statistically significant difference (P = 0.01) with an odds ratio of 7.9. Microscopically, I-PGCG was associated with: 1) lower multinucleated giant cell count (P = 0.04); 2) lower density of mesenchymal cells (P = 0.05); and 3) more diffuse, non-lobulated stromal morphology (P = 0.001). Clinically, I-RLs were found in patients who were older, and all cases were located in the posterior region: mandible (n = 12/14; 86%) and maxilla (n = 2/14; 14%).
CONCLUSIONS: In cases of implant failure, implantation of foreign bodies may play a role with subsequent development of I-PG and I-PGCG-like lesions. Clinicians should be aware of this risk so they can implement measures to minimize adverse implant outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental implants; foreign-body reaction; granuloma, giant cell; granuloma, pyogenic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26832832     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2016.150482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  4 in total

1.  An analysis of the prevalence of peripheral giant cell granuloma and pyogenic granuloma in relation to a dental implant.

Authors:  Nieves Román-Quesada; Beatriz González-Navarro; Keila Izquierdo-Gómez; Enric Jané-Salas; Antonio Marí-Roig; Albert Estrugo-Devesa; José López-López
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.757

2.  Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Zirconia Dental Implants-A Clinical Case Series Study.

Authors:  Jordi Gargallo-Albiol; Karl Böhm; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  A Biocompatible Ultrananocrystalline Diamond (UNCD) Coating for a New Generation of Dental Implants.

Authors:  Orlando Auciello; Sandra Renou; Karam Kang; Deborah Tasat; Daniel Olmedo
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 5.076

4.  KRAS Mutation in an Implant-associated Peripheral Giant Cell Granuloma of the Jaw: Implications of Genetic Analysis of the Lesion for Treatment Concept and Surveillance.

Authors:  Reinhard E Friedrich; Falk WÜsthoff; Andreas M Luebke; Felix K Kohlrusch; Ilse Wieland; Martin Zenker; Martin Gosau
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.406

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.