Mou Peng1, Lu Yi2, Yinhuai Wang1. 1. Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China. 2. Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China. Electronic address: yilu9999@126.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term efficacy and safety results of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) and plasmakinetic resection of prostate (PKRP), 2 methods of treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in mainland China. METHODS:One hundred twenty patients with LUTS secondary to BPH were randomly divided into 2 groups: PVP group (n = 61) and PKRP group (n = 59). Perioperative data and postoperative complications were recorded for both groups. Patients were followed up for 12 months after treatment. RESULTS: Compared with PKRP, PVP required a longer operation time (56 vs 41 minutes; P <.01). PVP also needed shorter catheterization time (2.4 vs 3.5 days; P <.01) and shorter length of hospitalization (3.5 vs 5.1 days; P <.01). International Prostate Symptom Score, Qmax, and quality of life score were significantly improved for both groups after surgery, and no significant differences were apparent between the 2 groups, for up to 12 months. Short-term complications were assessed in regard to necessity of blood transfusion (1 vs 1), clot retention (1 vs 0), reoperation (1 vs 0), incontinence (0 vs 0), urethral stricture (1 vs 0), and retrograde ejaculation (4 vs 6) in the PVP vs PKRP groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with BPH-related LUTS, PVP may be a superior treatment to PKRP as it relates to the endpoints of this study, with short-term results after a 12-month follow-up as length of hospital stay and catheterization time needed were both less than what was required for PKRP. Long-term comparative data are required to clearly define the role of PVP and PKRP in patients.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term efficacy and safety results of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) and plasmakinetic resection of prostate (PKRP), 2 methods of treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in mainland China. METHODS: One hundred twenty patients with LUTS secondary to BPH were randomly divided into 2 groups: PVP group (n = 61) and PKRP group (n = 59). Perioperative data and postoperative complications were recorded for both groups. Patients were followed up for 12 months after treatment. RESULTS: Compared with PKRP, PVP required a longer operation time (56 vs 41 minutes; P <.01). PVP also needed shorter catheterization time (2.4 vs 3.5 days; P <.01) and shorter length of hospitalization (3.5 vs 5.1 days; P <.01). International Prostate Symptom Score, Qmax, and quality of life score were significantly improved for both groups after surgery, and no significant differences were apparent between the 2 groups, for up to 12 months. Short-term complications were assessed in regard to necessity of blood transfusion (1 vs 1), clot retention (1 vs 0), reoperation (1 vs 0), incontinence (0 vs 0), urethral stricture (1 vs 0), and retrograde ejaculation (4 vs 6) in the PVP vs PKRP groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with BPH-related LUTS, PVP may be a superior treatment to PKRP as it relates to the endpoints of this study, with short-term results after a 12-month follow-up as length of hospital stay and catheterization time needed were both less than what was required for PKRP. Long-term comparative data are required to clearly define the role of PVP and PKRP in patients.
Authors: Giacomo Maria Pirola; Daniele Castellani; Ee Jean Lim; Marcelo Langer Wroclawski; Dong Le Quy Nguyen; Marilena Gubbiotti; Emanuele Rubilotta; Vinson Wai-Shun Chan; Mariela Corrales; Esther García Rojo; Thomas R W Herrmann; Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh; Vineet Gauhar Journal: World J Urol Date: 2022-02-13 Impact factor: 4.226