Literature DB >> 26831902

Coronary bypass graft perforation during percutaneous intervention.

Mohammed Andaleeb Chowdhury1, Mujeeb Abdul Sheikh2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery bypass grafts are prone to accelerated atherosclerosis and as such graft stenosis is frequently encountered in clinical practice. Complications specific to graft- PCI include no-reflow, distal embolization, stent restenosis and thrombosis. Graft perforation during PCI is a rare coomplication of the procedure. Published literature on the predictors of perforation and management strategy remains limited to anecdotal cases.
METHOD: In this review we collected data on all cases of graft perforations reported in PubMed/Medline from 1987 to 2015. RESULT: 37 cases of graft perforation were reported. High risk grafts for perforations included, old grafts (14±7.8years) with more than 80% luminal stenosis. Perforations were noted after use of different cardiac devices and included stent placement (30%, N=11), balloon angioplasty (36%, N=14), post-dilation with non complaint balloon (16%, N=6), guide wire perforation (1 case), post IVUS imaging (1 case) and one case after use of thrombus extraction device. Average stent diameter of 3.7±0.7 mm, average balloon pressure of 15.5±5 atm and 3 or more balloon inflations commonly resulted in graft perforation. 78% of cases reported class III perforation. Covered stent implantation was strongly associated with controlling acute bleed after graft perforation than prolonged balloon inflation (p=0.0001). Majority of cases reported using covered stents (81%). Average stent diameter of 3.9±0.7mm, average stent length of 18.5±6mm and the average deployment pressure of 14±2atm were reported to be effective in controlling the bleed. 95% of the patients did well post procedure and with prolonged hospitalization (8±4days). 24% of cases reported cardiac tamponade causing hemodynamic compromise including 2 peri-procedural deaths.
CONCLUSION: Graft perforation can be effectively treated with covered stent grafts with good immediate results, short term outcome and acceptable peri-procedural risks.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CABG; Covered stent; Graft perforation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26831902     DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med        ISSN: 1878-0938


  3 in total

Review 1.  Management of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Complications.

Authors:  Gregory Means; Christopher End; Prashant Kaul
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-04

2.  Central Vascular Complications Following Elective Catheterization Using Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Julia Merkle; Christopher Hohmann; Anton Sabashnikov; Thorsten Wahlers; Jens Wippermann
Journal:  J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep       Date:  2017-03-23

3.  Internal mammary artery injury during percutaneous coronary intervention: a case report.

Authors:  Zhicong Zeng; Yaqin Chen; Yinzhi Song; Fengxia Lin
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.298

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.