| Literature DB >> 26831422 |
Bhawna Yadav, Sunil K Malonia, Subeer S Majumdar, Pushpa Gupta, Neerja Wadhwa, Archana Badhwar, Umesh D Gupta, Vishwa M Katoch, Samit Chattopadhyay1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26831422 PMCID: PMC4774070 DOI: 10.4103/0971-5916.174566
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Med Res ISSN: 0971-5916 Impact factor: 2.375
Oligonucleotide sequences used for genotyping, semi-quantitative and quantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR
Fig. 1Genotyping and expression analysis in SMAR1 transgenic mice (A) Genotyping of SMAR1 transgenic mice performed on tail tissue DNA by PCR, using primers from CMV promoter and gene coding junction. P1 and P2 denote the position of primers; presence 400 bp amplicon confirmed the presence of transgene in positively scored mice. Left panel, BALB/c-SMAR1 transgenic genotype patterns (Lane 1 pEGFP-SMAR1 plasmid template as positive control, lanes 2, 3, 5, 6 represent transgenic litters, lane 4 represents wild type mice and M denotes 1 kb DNA ladder). Right panel represent genotypes from C57BL/6-SMAR1 transgenic litters (lanes 1, 3, 4, 6 represent transgenic litters while lanes 2, 5 represent wild type litters). (B) SMAR1 expression in lymph node (LN), thymus (Thy), spleen (SP) from wild type BALB/c (lanes 1, 2, 3) and BALB/c-EGFP-SMAR1 transgenic (lanes 4, 5, 6). (C) SMAR1 expression in thymus (Thy) and spleen (SP) of wild type C57BL/6 (lanes 1, 2) and C57BL/6-SMAR1 transgenic mice (lanes 3, 4) by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. Actin β is monitored as a loading control. (D) & (E) Densitometry analysis of Fig. 1B & 1C, by Image J Software demonstrating the fold change in expression after normalization with actin loading control. Error bar represents ± SD from three indpendent experiments. (F) Expression analysis of IFN-γ mRNA by quantitative RT-PCR in splenic CD4+ T cells from wild type and SMAR1 transgenic mice stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 ligands for 24 h. (G) ELISA demonstrating the secretion of IFN-γ by CD4+ T cells stimulated ex vivo with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 ligands. Error bars represent ± SEM from three independent experiments (**P<0.01).
Fig. 2Determination of bacterial burden in target organs of wild type and SMAR1 transgenic mice of BALB/c and C57BL/6 genetic backgrounds. Mice were infected with M. tuberculosis strain, H37Rv through aerosol. Mycobacterial burden was determined in lungs after 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 wk (A-B) and spleen (C-D) after 0, 4, 6 and 8 wk post infection. Data represent mean ± SD with four mice per group at each time point (*P<0.05).
Fig. 3Plot demonstrating acid-fast bacilli (AFB) count in SMAR1 transgenic and wild type mice lungs. For quantification of bacilli in tissue sections 20 fields/slide were analyzed and average mean count was determined. Error bar represents average mean of five tissue sections from each animal (*P<0.05).
Fig. 4Expression analysis of Th1 pathway genes in infected lung tissues. (A-C) Relative expression of IFN-γ, IL-12 and iNOS in infected lung samples from wild type and SMAR1 transgenic mice during the course of infection, determined by quantitative RT-PCR. The Y-axis denotes the relative expression represented as fold change after normalization with the values obtained from uninfected mice. GAPDH was used as an internal control. Values are represented as mean ± SD (n=4); *P<0.05.