Guat Cheng Ang1, Di Zhang2, Kim Hwa Jim Lim1. 1. Department of Geriatric Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore. 2. Department of Nursing, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study explored and compared the differences in attitudes toward end-of-life care among patients, relatives and healthcare professionals, including doctors and nurses. METHODS: We performed a descriptive study on a cross-section of the population of a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Data was collected using a questionnaire survey involving 50 participants from each of the four groups of patients, relatives, doctors and nurses. RESULTS: Family members were the most commonly nominated surrogate decision-makers by the patient group (76%) and the majority of the relative group (74%) felt comfortable deciding on end-of-life care for their loved ones. However, the patient and relative groups differed significantly in their preferences on end-of-life care options, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (p = 0.001), intubation (p = 0.003), nasogastric tube feeding (p < 0.001) and the use of antibiotics (p = 0.023). Doctors, nurses and relatives demonstrated differences in preference between end-of-life care for themselves and for their loved ones, especially with regard to the use of nasogastric tube feeding. There was also a difference between patients and doctors in their decisions on CPR (p < 0.001) and intubation (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the importance of early planning for end-of-life care. This must be initiated proactively by healthcare professionals to engage patients in a culturally sensitive manner to discuss their preferences, in order to facilitate open communication between the patient and family.
INTRODUCTION: This study explored and compared the differences in attitudes toward end-of-life care among patients, relatives and healthcare professionals, including doctors and nurses. METHODS: We performed a descriptive study on a cross-section of the population of a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Data was collected using a questionnaire survey involving 50 participants from each of the four groups of patients, relatives, doctors and nurses. RESULTS: Family members were the most commonly nominated surrogate decision-makers by the patient group (76%) and the majority of the relative group (74%) felt comfortable deciding on end-of-life care for their loved ones. However, the patient and relative groups differed significantly in their preferences on end-of-life care options, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (p = 0.001), intubation (p = 0.003), nasogastric tube feeding (p < 0.001) and the use of antibiotics (p = 0.023). Doctors, nurses and relatives demonstrated differences in preference between end-of-life care for themselves and for their loved ones, especially with regard to the use of nasogastric tube feeding. There was also a difference between patients and doctors in their decisions on CPR (p < 0.001) and intubation (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the importance of early planning for end-of-life care. This must be initiated proactively by healthcare professionals to engage patients in a culturally sensitive manner to discuss their preferences, in order to facilitate open communication between the patient and family.
Authors: Joseph J Gallo; Joseph B Straton; Michael J Klag; Lucy A Meoni; Daniel P Sulmasy; Nae-Yuh Wang; Daniel E Ford Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Natasja J H Raijmakers; Sarah Fradsham; Lia van Zuylen; Catriona Mayland; John E Ellershaw; Agnes van der Heide Journal: Curr Opin Support Palliat Care Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 2.302
Authors: Leung-Wing Chu; James K H Luk; Elsie Hui; Patrick K C Chiu; Cherry S Y Chan; Fiona Kwan; Timothy Kwok; Diana Lee; Jean Woo Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2010-10-23 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Dirk Houttekier; Joachim Cohen; Johan Bilsen; Julia Addington-Hall; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Luc Deliens Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Kai Chee Hung; Lai Wei Lee; Yi Xin Liew; Lalit Krishna; Maciej Piotr Chlebicki; Shimin Jasmine Chung; Andrea Lay-Hoon Kwa Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 3.267