Literature DB >> 26831249

An Exact Procedure for the Evaluation of Reference-Scaled Average Bioequivalence.

Laszlo Tothfalusi1, Laszlo Endrenyi2.   

Abstract

Reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) has been recommended by Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and in its closely related form by European Medicines Agency (EMA), for the determination of bioequivalence (BE) of highly variable (HV) and narrow therapeutic index (NTI) drug products. FDA suggested that RSABE be evaluated by an approximating procedure. Development of an alternative, numerically exact approach was sought. A new algorithm, called Exact, was derived for the assessment of RSABE. It is based upon the observation that the statistical model of RSABE follows a noncentral t distribution. The parameters of the distribution were derived for crossover and parallel-group study designs. Simulated BE studies of HV and NTI drugs compared the power and consumer risk of the proposed Exact method with those recommended by FDA and EMA. The Exact method had generally slightly higher power than the FDA approach. The consumer risks of the Exact and FDA procedures were generally below the nominal error risk with both methods except for the partial replicate design under certain heteroscedastic conditions. The estimator of RSABE was biased; simulations demonstrated the appropriateness of Hedges' correction. The FDA approach had another, small but meaningful bias. The confidence intervals of RSABE, based on the derived exact, analytical formulas, are uniformly most powerful. Their computation requires in standard cases only a single-line program script. The algorithm assumes that the estimates of the within-subject variances of both formulations are available. With each algorithm, the consumer risk is higher than 5% when the partial replicate design is applied.

Keywords:  bioequivalence; exact method; highly variable drugs; narrow therapeutic index; reference-scaled average bioequivalence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26831249      PMCID: PMC4779113          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-016-9873-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  14 in total

1.  A small sample confidence interval approach to assess individual bioequivalence.

Authors:  T Hyslop; F Hsuan; D J Holder
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Properties of the estimated variance component for subject-by-formulation interaction in studies of individual bioequivalence.

Authors:  L Endrenyi; N Taback; L Tothfalusi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Subject-by-formulation interaction in determinations of individual bioequivalence: bias and prevalence.

Authors:  L Endrenyi; L Tothfalusi
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Limits for the scaled average bioequivalence of highly variable drugs and drug products.

Authors:  Laszlo Tothfalusi; Laszlo Endrenyi
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Beyond the F test: Effect size confidence intervals and tests of close fit in the analysis of variance and contrast analysis.

Authors:  James H Steiger
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2004-06

Review 6.  Bioequivalence approaches for highly variable drugs and drug products.

Authors:  Sam H Haidar; Barbara Davit; Mei-Ling Chen; Dale Conner; LaiMing Lee; Qian H Li; Robert Lionberger; Fairouz Makhlouf; Devvrat Patel; Donald J Schuirmann; Lawrence X Yu
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 7.  Evaluation of bioequivalence for highly variable drugs with scaled average bioequivalence.

Authors:  Laszlo Tothfalusi; Laszlo Endrenyi; Alfredo Garcia Arieta
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  A Bioequivalence Approach for Generic Narrow Therapeutic Index Drugs: Evaluation of the Reference-Scaled Approach and Variability Comparison Criterion.

Authors:  Wenlei Jiang; Fairouz Makhlouf; Donald J Schuirmann; Xinyuan Zhang; Nan Zheng; Dale Conner; Lawrence X Yu; Robert Lionberger
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.009

9.  A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability.

Authors:  D J Schuirmann
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1987-12

10.  Regulatory and study conditions for the determination of bioequivalence of highly variable drugs.

Authors:  Laszlo Endrenyi; Laszlo Tothfalusi
Journal:  J Pharm Pharm Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.327

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Bioequivalence for highly variable drugs: regulatory agreements, disagreements, and harmonization.

Authors:  Laszlo Endrenyi; Laszlo Tothfalusi
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Association of Variability and Pharmacogenomics With Bioequivalence of Gefitinib in Healthy Male Subjects.

Authors:  Hong Zhang; Qingmei Li; Xiaoxue Zhu; Min Wu; Cuiyun Li; Xiaojiao Li; Chengjiao Liu; Zhenwei Shen; Yanhua Ding; Shucheng Hua
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 5.810

3.  Bioequivalence Study Comparing Fixed-Dose Combination of Clopidogrel and Aspirin with Coadministration of Individual Formulations in Chinese Subjects Under Fed Conditions: A Phase I, Open-Label, Randomized, Crossover Study.

Authors:  Yan Li; Jeffrey E Ming; Fangyuan Kong; Huiqiu Yin; Linlin Zhang; Haihong Bai; Huijuan Liu; Lu Qi; Yu Wang; Fang Xie; Na Yang; Chuan Ping; Yi Li; Liu Chen; Chunyu Han; Ju Liu; Xinghe Wang
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.845

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.