Literature DB >> 26831209

Teaching and assessing ethics in the newborn ICU.

Christy L Cummings1.   

Abstract

Ethics and professionalism education has become increasingly recognized as important and incorporated into graduate medical education. However, such education has remained largely unstructured and understudied in neonatology. Neonatal-perinatal fellowship training programs have generally grappled with how best to teach and assess ethics and professionalism knowledge, skills, and behavior in clinical practice, particularly in light of accreditation requirements, milestones, and competencies. This article reviews currently available teaching methods, pedagogy, and resources in medical ethics, professionalism, and communication, as well as assessment strategies and tools, to help medical educators and practicing clinicians ensure trainees achieve and maintain competency. The need for consensus and future research in these domains is also highlighted.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Assessment; Communication; Competency; Entrustable professional activity; Ethics; Graduate medical education; Milestones; Neonatology; Professionalism; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26831209     DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Perinatol        ISSN: 0146-0005            Impact factor:   3.300


  5 in total

1.  Decision making at extreme prematurity: Innovation in clinician education.

Authors:  Anne Sullivan; Christy L Cummings
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.311

2.  Needs assessment of ethics and communication teaching for neonatal perinatal medicine programs in Canada.

Authors:  Thierry Daboval; Emanuela Ferretti; Ahmed Moussa; Michael van Manen; Gregory P Moore; Ganesh Srinivasan; Alexandru Moldovan; Amisha Agarwal; Susan Albersheim
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Daniel Zhihao Hong; Jia Ling Goh; Zhi Yang Ong; Jacquelin Jia Qi Ting; Mun Kit Wong; Jiaxuan Wu; Xiu Hui Tan; Rachelle Qi En Toh; Christine Li Ling Chiang; Caleb Wei Hao Ng; Jared Chuan Kai Ng; Yun Ting Ong; Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong; Kuang Teck Tay; Laura Hui Shuen Tan; Gillian Li Gek Phua; Warren Fong; Limin Wijaya; Shirlyn Hui Shan Neo; Alexia Sze Inn Lee; Min Chiam; Annelissa Mien Chew Chin; Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Explaining professionalism in moral reasoning: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Farahnaz Kamali; Alireza Yousefy; Nikoo Yamani
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2019-06-26

5.  Testing a Communication Assessment Tool for Ethically Sensitive Scenarios: Protocol of a Validation Study.

Authors:  Thierry Daboval; Natalie Ward; Jordan R Schoenherr; Gregory P Moore; Caitlin Carew; Alicia Lambrinakos-Raymond; Emanuela Ferretti
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2019-05-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.