Literature DB >> 26831153

Can tail damage outbreaks in the pig be predicted by behavioural change?

Mona Lilian Vestbjerg Larsen1, Heidi Mai-Lis Andersen2, Lene Juul Pedersen2.   

Abstract

Tail biting, resulting in outbreaks of tail damage in pigs, is a multifactorial welfare and economic problem which is usually partly prevented through tail docking. According to European Union legislation, tail docking is not allowed on a routine basis; thus there is a need for alternative preventive methods. One strategy is the surveillance of the pigs' behaviour for known preceding indicators of tail damage, which makes it possible to predict a tail damage outbreak and prevent it in proper time. This review discusses the existing literature on behavioural changes observed prior to a tail damage outbreak. Behaviours found to change prior to an outbreak include increased activity level, increased performance of enrichment object manipulation, and a changed proportion of tail posture with more tails between the legs. Monitoring these types of behaviours is also discussed for the purpose of developing an automatic warning system for tail damage outbreaks, with activity level showing promising results for being monitored automatically. Encouraging results have been found so far for the development of an automatic warning system; however, there is a need for further investigation and development, starting with the description of the temporal development of the predictive behaviour in relation to tail damage outbreaks.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioural change; Monitoring behaviour; Pig; Prediction; Tail biting

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26831153     DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet J        ISSN: 1090-0233            Impact factor:   2.688


  7 in total

1.  Effects of tail docking and tail biting on performance and welfare of growing-finishing pigs in a confinement housing system.

Authors:  Y Z Li; H F Zhang; L J Johnston; W Martin; J D Peterson; J F Coetzee
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Early detection of health and welfare compromises through automated detection of behavioural changes in pigs.

Authors:  Stephen G Matthews; Amy L Miller; James Clapp; Thomas Plötz; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.688

3.  Multi-Step Tail Biting Outbreak Intervention Protocols for Pigs Housed on Slatted Floors.

Authors:  Jen-Yun Chou; Keelin O'Driscoll; Rick B D'Eath; Dale A Sandercock; Irene Camerlink
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Expert opinion on metal chains and other indestructible objects as proper enrichment for intensively-farmed pigs.

Authors:  Marc B M Bracke; Paul Koene
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  A Review of the Effects of Non-Straw Enrichment on Tail Biting in Pigs.

Authors:  Stephanie Buijs; Ramon Muns
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Automatic early warning of tail biting in pigs: 3D cameras can detect lowered tail posture before an outbreak.

Authors:  Richard B D'Eath; Mhairi Jack; Agnieszka Futro; Darren Talbot; Qiming Zhu; David Barclay; Emma M Baxter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Using Passive Infrared Detectors to Record Group Activity and Activity in Certain Focus Areas in Fattening Pigs.

Authors:  Naemi Von Jasmund; Anna Wellnitz; Manuel Stephan Krommweh; Wolfgang Büscher
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 2.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.