| Literature DB >> 26831146 |
Li Ruixin1, Li Dong2,3, Zhao Bin4,5, Li Hao6, Leng Xue7, Shi Caihong8, Su Weihua9, Qin Xiaoli10, Yuan Yinghai11, An Weining12, Zhang Xizheng13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the process of bone defective reparation and engineered bone tissue construction, osteoblasts are adhered to the surface of the scaffold materials and impart the external mechanical load to the osteoblasts. So, the dynamic mechanical property of the scaffolds play an important role in the bone tissue repair and it is valuable to research. Material type and the architectural design of scaffolds are also important to facilitate cell and tissue growth. The aim of this study was to prepare a kind of material with good pore connectivity and analyze its dynamic mechanical property.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26831146 PMCID: PMC4735958 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-015-0114-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Eng Online ISSN: 1475-925X Impact factor: 2.819
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of micro-HA/CS composite scaffolds shaping method
Fig. 2FTIR spectra of HA
Fig. 3XRD spectra of HA
Fig. 4Particle size distribution of micro-HA
HA particle size distribution
| Particle size (μm) | Differential distribution (%) | Cumulation distribution (%) | Particle size (μm) | Differential distribution (%) | Cumulation distribution (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.20 | 2.89 | 1.63 | 94.56 | ||
| 0.24 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 3.50 | 2.14 | 96.70 |
| 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 4.24 | 1.87 | 98.58 |
| 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 5.13 | 1.03 | 99.61 |
| 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 6.21 | 0.38 | 99.99 |
| 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 7.51 | 0.01 | 100.00 |
| 0.63 | 2.84 | 2.89 | 9.09 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| 0.76 | 7.70 | 10.58 | 11.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| 0.92 | 12.17 | 22.75 | 13.31 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| 1.11 | 15.46 | 38.21 | 16.11 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| 1.35 | 19.84 | 58.05 | 19.50 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| 1.63 | 18.55 | 76.60 | 23.60 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| 1.97 | 11.21 | 87.81 | 28.56 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| 2.39 | 5.13 | 92.93 | 34.57 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
Fig. 5Optical microscopic images of spherical porogens
Fig. 6SEM micrographs of composite scaffolds prepared by the particulate leaching method: Vcomposition:Vmicrospheres ➀ 50:20 ➁ 50:30 ➂ 50:40 ➃ 50:50 ➄ 50:60 ➅ 50:70
Fig. 7Porosity of micro-HA/CS composite scaffolds. Vcomposition : Vmicrospheres ➀ 50:20 ➁ 50:30 ➂ 50:40 ➃ 50:50 ➄ 50:60 ➅ 50:70
Fig. 8Water absorption of composite scaffolds
Fig. 9Modulus values for the composite scaffolds. Instantaneous and steady-state modulus values are shown in (a, b), respectively
Fig. 10Hysteresis loops during the sixth loading cycle in 1 Hz, 10 % sinusoidal strain for samples
Fig. 11Maximum stress values for each group during the sixth compression cycle. Show no significance difference in the peak stress of the three samples
Fig. 12The hysteresis values during the first compression cycle of sample. Show no significance difference in the peak hysteresis of the three samples
Fig. 13The hysteresis values during the sixth compression cycle of sample. Show no significance difference in the peak hysteresis of the three samples
Fig. 14Hysteresis analysis. Hysteresis difference values between the sixth compression cycle and the initial cycle for three samples. Results are not significantly different between three samples