Literature DB >> 26831040

Public satisfaction with the healthcare system performance in South Korea: Universal healthcare system.

Kisoo Park1, Jumin Park2, Young Dae Kwon3, Yoonjeong Kang4, Jin-Won Noh5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An awareness of the public's level of satisfaction with health professionals is becoming more important as steps are being taken to improve quality, reduce costs, and implement reform. The purpose of this study is to assess public satisfaction with the healthcare system and to examine the relationship between satisfaction and socio-demographic factors in the context of the health care environment in the Republic of Korea.
METHODS: The data were obtained from 1573 adults aged 20-69 in three major areas - Seoul, Gyeonggi, and Busan - by the Ministry of Health and Welfare during June and July 2011 in South Korea. Satisfaction with the healthcare system was evaluated by using 13 items in three sections: access to care, cost of care, and quality of care. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to examine the validity of satisfaction with a healthcare system performance questionnaire. A structural equation model (SEM) was estimated to assess the relative impact of demographic and socio-economic variables on satisfaction.
RESULTS: The study proposed a comprehensive three-factor model of healthcare system performance satisfaction. Among the three factors, the quality of care had the largest impact on satisfaction with the healthcare system, suggesting that is the most important determinant of consumers' satisfaction with their healthcare system. Regarding the relationships between public satisfaction and demographic and socio-economic variables, residence and marital status were significant predictors of the satisfaction level.
CONCLUSIONS: It is important to be aware of the potential significance of background variables in determining satisfaction with the healthcare system. An understanding of the characteristics of the sample enables healthcare managers and/or policymakers to inform targeted follow-up actions.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Keywords:  Healthcare system; Satisfaction; South Korea; Universal healthcare system

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26831040     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  9 in total

1.  Healthcare Policy Agenda for a Sustainable Healthcare System in Korea: Building Consensus Using the Delphi Method.

Authors:  Seung Hoon Kim; Hye Jin Joo; Joo Youn Kim; Hyo Jeong Kim; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 5.354

2.  Socioeconomic inequality in public satisfaction with the healthcare system in China: a quantile regression analysis.

Authors:  XinXin Peng; Jing Hua Zhang
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2022-07-08

3.  Patients' satisfaction with outpatient pharmacy services and associated factors in Debre Tabor comprehensive specialized hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mulugeta Molla; Woretaw Sisay; Yared Andargie; Belayneh Kefale; Pradeep Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Impact of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Versus Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drug Treatment on Radiographic Progression in Early Ankylosing Spondylitis: Its Relationship to Inflammation Control During Treatment.

Authors:  Jun Won Park; Min Jung Kim; Jeong Seok Lee; You-Jung Ha; Jin Kyun Park; Eun Ha Kang; Yun Jong Lee; Yeong Wook Song; Eun Young Lee
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 10.995

Review 5.  A Comparative Analysis of Factors Influencing Two Outbreaks of Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) in Saudi Arabia and South Korea.

Authors:  Marnie Willman; Darwyn Kobasa; Jason Kindrachuk
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 5.048

6.  How do Chinese people perceive their healthcare system? Trends and determinants of public satisfaction and perceived fairness, 2006-2019.

Authors:  Yishan Zhu; Yuanyuan Li; Ming Wu; Hongqiao Fu
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  How do policy levers shape the quality of a national health system?

Authors:  Juan David García-Corchero; Dolores Jiménez-Rubio
Journal:  J Policy Model       Date:  2021-10-21

8.  Public trust in the long-term care insurance pilot program in China: An analysis of mediating effects.

Authors:  Rong Peng; Wansha Zhang; Xueqin Deng; Bei Wu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-19

9.  Improving People's Self-Reported Experience with the Health Services: The Role of Non-Clinical Factors.

Authors:  Ángel Fernández-Pérez; Ángeles Sánchez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.