Kathryn Kinasz1, Erin C Accurso2, Andrea E Kass3, Daniel Le Grange4. 1. Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: kkinasz@uchicago.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Eating disorders (EDs) impact both males and females, but little is known about sex differences in ED psychopathology and overall clinical presentation. This study compared demographic and clinical characteristics of child and adolescent males and females who presented for ED treatment. METHODS: Participants included 619 youth (59 males and 560 females) ages 6-18 years who presented for treatment between 1999 and 2011. RESULTS: Males presented for ED treatment at a significantly younger age (p < .001), earlier age of onset (p = .004), and were more likely to be nonwhite (p = .023). Females showed more severe ED pathology across the Eating Disorder Examination subscales (weight concern: p < .001; eating concern: p < .001; restraint: p = .001; and shape concern: p = .019) and global score (p < .001). Males were more likely to present with an ED other than anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa (p = .002). Females presented with significantly higher rates of mood disorders (p = .027) and had a lower average percent of expected body weight (p = .020). Males and females did not differ in duration of illness, prior hospitalization or treatment, binging and purging episodes, anxiety disorders, behavioral disorders, or self-esteem. All analyses were controlled for age. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that further exploration into why the sexes present differently may be warranted. Developing ED psychopathology assessments that better capture nuances particular to males and reevaluating criteria to better categorize male ED diagnoses may allow for more targeted treatment.
PURPOSE:Eating disorders (EDs) impact both males and females, but little is known about sex differences in ED psychopathology and overall clinical presentation. This study compared demographic and clinical characteristics of child and adolescent males and females who presented for ED treatment. METHODS:Participants included 619 youth (59 males and 560 females) ages 6-18 years who presented for treatment between 1999 and 2011. RESULTS: Males presented for ED treatment at a significantly younger age (p < .001), earlier age of onset (p = .004), and were more likely to be nonwhite (p = .023). Females showed more severe ED pathology across the Eating Disorder Examination subscales (weight concern: p < .001; eating concern: p < .001; restraint: p = .001; and shape concern: p = .019) and global score (p < .001). Males were more likely to present with an ED other than anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa (p = .002). Females presented with significantly higher rates of mood disorders (p = .027) and had a lower average percent of expected body weight (p = .020). Males and females did not differ in duration of illness, prior hospitalization or treatment, binging and purging episodes, anxiety disorders, behavioral disorders, or self-esteem. All analyses were controlled for age. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that further exploration into why the sexes present differently may be warranted. Developing ED psychopathology assessments that better capture nuances particular to males and reevaluating criteria to better categorize male ED diagnoses may allow for more targeted treatment.
Authors: David V Sheehan; Kathy H Sheehan; R Douglas Shytle; Juris Janavs; Yvonne Bannon; Jamison E Rogers; Karen M Milo; Saundra L Stock; Berney Wilkinson Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Michael Strober; Roberta Freeman; Carlyn Lampert; Jane Diamond; Cheryl Teplinsky; Mark DeAntonio Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Alison M Darcy; Angela Celio Doyle; James Lock; Rebecka Peebles; Peter Doyle; Daniel Le Grange Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2011-02-18 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Mary Quattlebaum; Natasha L Burke; M K Higgins Neyland; William Leu; Natasha A Schvey; Abigail Pine; Alexandria Morettini; Sarah LeMay-Russell; Denise E Wilfley; Mark Stephens; Tracy Sbrocco; Jack A Yanovski; Sarah Jorgensen; Cara Olsen; David Klein; Jeffrey Quinlan; Marian Tanofsky-Kraff Journal: Eat Behav Date: 2019-04-11
Authors: Zeynep Yilmaz; Katherine Schaumberg; Matthew Halvorsen; Erica L Goodman; Leigh C Brosof; James J Crowley; Carol A Mathews; Manuel Mattheisen; Gerome Breen; Cynthia M Bulik; Nadia Micali; Stephanie C Zerwas Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 10.592
Authors: Stefano Valente; Giulia Di Girolamo; Martina Forlani; Anna Biondini; Paolo Scudellari; Diana De Ronchi; Anna Rita Atti Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Allegra R Gordon; S Bryn Austin; Jordan Schultz; Carly E Guss; Jerel P Calzo; Monica L Wang Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 7.830