Casey Crump1, Jan Sundquist2, Marilyn A Winkleby3, Kristina Sundquist2. 1. Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. 2. Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. 3. Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Greater blood pressure reactivity to psychological stress has been associated with higher risk of developing hypertension. We hypothesised that low stress resilience based on psychological assessment early in life is associated with hypertension in adulthood. METHODS: National cohort study of 1,547,182 military conscripts in Sweden during 1969-1997 (97-98% of all 18-year-old males) without prior history of hypertension, who underwent standardised psychological assessment by trained psychologists for stress resilience (1-9 scale), and were followed up for hypertension identified from outpatient and inpatient diagnoses during 1969-2012 (maximum age 62). RESULTS: 93,028 men were diagnosed with hypertension in 39.4 million person-years of follow-up. Adjusting for body mass index (BMI), family history and socioeconomic factors, low stress resilience at age 18 was associated with increased risk of hypertension in adulthood (lowest vs highest quintile: HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.40 to 1.46; p < 0.001; incidence rates, 278.7 vs 180.0 per 100,000 person-years), including a strong linear trend across the full range of stress resilience (p(trend) < 0.0001). We also found a positive additive interaction between stress resilience and BMI (p < 0.001), indicating that low stress resilience accounted for more hypertension cases among those with high BMI. Men with a combination of low stress resilience and high BMI had a more than threefold risk of hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that low stress resilience may contribute to etiological pathways for hypertension and accounts for more cases among those with high BMI. If confirmed, this knowledge may help inform better preventive interventions by addressing psychosocial risk factors and stress management across the lifespan. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
OBJECTIVE: Greater blood pressure reactivity to psychological stress has been associated with higher risk of developing hypertension. We hypothesised that low stress resilience based on psychological assessment early in life is associated with hypertension in adulthood. METHODS: National cohort study of 1,547,182 military conscripts in Sweden during 1969-1997 (97-98% of all 18-year-old males) without prior history of hypertension, who underwent standardised psychological assessment by trained psychologists for stress resilience (1-9 scale), and were followed up for hypertension identified from outpatient and inpatient diagnoses during 1969-2012 (maximum age 62). RESULTS: 93,028 men were diagnosed with hypertension in 39.4 million person-years of follow-up. Adjusting for body mass index (BMI), family history and socioeconomic factors, low stress resilience at age 18 was associated with increased risk of hypertension in adulthood (lowest vs highest quintile: HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.40 to 1.46; p < 0.001; incidence rates, 278.7 vs 180.0 per 100,000 person-years), including a strong linear trend across the full range of stress resilience (p(trend) < 0.0001). We also found a positive additive interaction between stress resilience and BMI (p < 0.001), indicating that low stress resilience accounted for more hypertension cases among those with high BMI. Men with a combination of low stress resilience and high BMI had a more than threefold risk of hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that low stress resilience may contribute to etiological pathways for hypertension and accounts for more cases among those with high BMI. If confirmed, this knowledge may help inform better preventive interventions by addressing psychosocial risk factors and stress management across the lifespan. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Authors: Patricia M Kearney; Megan Whelton; Kristi Reynolds; Paul Muntner; Paul K Whelton; Jiang He Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Jan 15-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Maxwell V Rainforth; Robert H Schneider; Sanford I Nidich; Carolyn Gaylord-King; John W Salerno; James W Anderson Journal: Curr Hypertens Rep Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 5.369
Authors: Tawseef Dar; Michael T Osborne; Shady Abohashem; Taimur Abbasi; Karmel W Choi; Ahmed Ghoneem; Nicki Naddaf; Jordan W Smoller; Roger K Pitman; John W Denninger; Lisa M Shin; Gregory Fricchione; Ahmed Tawakol Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Anwal Ghulam; Marialaura Bonaccio; Simona Costanzo; Alessandro Gialluisi; Federica Santonastaso; Augusto Di Castelnuovo; Chiara Cerletti; Maria Benedetta Donati; Giovanni de Gaetano; Francesco Gianfagna; Licia Iacoviello Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-25 Impact factor: 3.390