Literature DB >> 26830609

Prognostic significance of parameters from pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Da-Wei Sun1, Lin An2, Feng Wei1, Lin Mu3, Xiao-Ju Shi1, Chuan-Lei Wang1, Zheng-Wei Zhao1, Teng-Fei Li1, Guo-Yue Lv4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The prognostic value of (18)F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains inconclusive. This study aims to investigate the prognostic role of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET on HCC patients by meta-analysis.
METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Wanfang databases were searched until June 2015. Hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were synthesized by Stata 10.0, and the combined results were used as effective values.
RESULTS: Twenty-two studies containing a total of 1721 patients were identified. According to random-effect model, meta-analysis results showed that high Tumor SUV/Liver SUV (Tsuv/Lsuv) ratio was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.04; 95% CI 1.50-2.79; P = 0.000) and poorer disease-free survival (HR = 7.17; 95% CI 3.58-14.36; P = 0.000); and high Tumor SUV (Tsuv) value was also correlated with poor OS (HR = 1.53; 95% CI 1.26-1.87; P = 0.000). Meanwhile, subgroup analysis results showed that the significant association above was not altered by study sample size, parameter cutoff value, analytic method, and follow-up period, but there was no significant association between Tsuv/Lsuv ratio and OS in patients who underwent resection (HR = 1.71; 95% CI 1.00-2.92; P = 0.052).
CONCLUSIONS: Both high Tsuv/Lsuv ratio and high Tsuv value are associated with poor prognosis in HCC patients. Therefore, pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET is a useful tool in predicting the prognosis of HCC patients. More studies with explicit treatment modalities are required to investigate the prognostic value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET on HCC patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET); Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); Meta-analysis; Prognosis; Tumor SUV (Tsuv); Tumor SUV/Liver SUV (Tsuv/Lsuv)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26830609     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-015-0603-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  9 in total

1.  Nomograms in Hepatectomy Patients with Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jong Man Kim; Choon Hyuck David Kwon; Jae-Won Joh; Heejin Yoo; Kyunga Kim; Dong Hyun Sinn; Gyu-Seong Choi; Joon Hyeok Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Current status of imaging biomarkers predicting the biological nature of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Norihide Yoneda; Osamu Matsui; Satoshi Kobayashi; Azusa Kitao; Kazuto Kozaka; Dai Inoue; Kotaro Yoshida; Tetsuya Minami; Wataru Koda; Toshifumi Gabata
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Chae Hong Lim; Seung Hwan Moon; Young Seok Cho; Joon Young Choi; Kyung-Han Lee; Seung Hyup Hyun
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  18F-FDG PET/CT predicts survival after 90Y transarterial radioembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Mario Jreige; Periklis Mitsakis; Axel Van Der Gucht; Anastasia Pomoni; Marina Silva-Monteiro; Silvano Gnesin; Ariane Boubaker; Marie Nicod-Lalonde; Rafael Duran; John O Prior; Alban Denys; Niklaus Schaefer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Prognostic value of pre-treatment F-18-FDG PET-CT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing radioembolization.

Authors:  Yazan Abuodeh; Arash O Naghavi; Kamran A Ahmed; Puja S Venkat; Youngchul Kim; Bela Kis; Junsung Choi; Benjamin Biebel; Jennifer Sweeney; Daniel A Anaya; Richard Kim; Mokenge Malafa; Jessica M Frakes; Sarah E Hoffe; Ghassan El-Haddad
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Prognostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT parameters in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dongyong Zhu; Lisha Wang; Hanfei Zhang; Jie Chen; Yanfang Wang; Sama Byanju; Meiyan Liao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 7.  18F-FDG-PET for Assessing Biological Viability and Prognosis in Liver Transplant Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Arno Kornberg; Martina Schernhammer; Helmut Friess
Journal:  J Clin Transl Hepatol       Date:  2017-07-08

8.  Prognosis of preoperative positron emission tomography uptake in hepatectomy patients.

Authors:  Jong Man Kim; Choon Hyuck David Kwon; Jae-Won Joh; Dong Hyun Sinn; Gyu-Seong Choi; Seung Woon Paik
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 1.859

Review 9.  Optimization of the Clinical Effectiveness of Radioembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Dosimetry and Patient-Selection Criteria.

Authors:  Philippe d'Abadie; Stephan Walrand; Renaud Lhommel; Michel Hesse; Ivan Borbath; François Jamar
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.109

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.