Lindsay K Brown1, Dee E Fenner, John O L DeLancey, Megan O Schimpf. 1. From the *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and †Division of Gynecology/Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to define patient knowledge and perceptions of pessaries to identify barriers to care and inform physician counseling efforts. METHODS: An anonymous survey was distributed to a convenience sample of new patients presenting to the urogynecology clinic at a single academic medical center. Data analysis was performed using standard bivariate and logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 254 women completed the survey. Only half of respondents indicated prior knowledge of pessaries. The most common source of prior knowledge was a physician or other health care provider (100/130, 76.9%); comparatively few women had heard about pessaries from any other source. Patients presented with a negative view of pessaries, 3.6 ± 2.2 on a 0- to 10-point Likert scale, and only a third of patients indicated they would consider pessary use as a treatment option for their condition. On multivariable logistic regression, having previously seen a gynecologist (P = 0.03) and a lower level of education (P = 0.05) independently predicted aversion to pessary use. CONCLUSIONS: Only half of patients presenting to a referral-based practice had previous knowledge of vaginal pessaries. Few patients had heard about pessaries from any source other than a physician or other health care provider. Patients presented with a negative impression of pessaries and a high level of aversion to pessary use. Patients who indicated they would decline pessary use reported a lower level of education and were more likely to have previously seen a gynecologist for evaluation of their condition. These data may inform physician counseling efforts.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to define patient knowledge and perceptions of pessaries to identify barriers to care and inform physician counseling efforts. METHODS: An anonymous survey was distributed to a convenience sample of new patients presenting to the urogynecology clinic at a single academic medical center. Data analysis was performed using standard bivariate and logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 254 women completed the survey. Only half of respondents indicated prior knowledge of pessaries. The most common source of prior knowledge was a physician or other health care provider (100/130, 76.9%); comparatively few women had heard about pessaries from any other source. Patients presented with a negative view of pessaries, 3.6 ± 2.2 on a 0- to 10-point Likert scale, and only a third of patients indicated they would consider pessary use as a treatment option for their condition. On multivariable logistic regression, having previously seen a gynecologist (P = 0.03) and a lower level of education (P = 0.05) independently predicted aversion to pessary use. CONCLUSIONS: Only half of patients presenting to a referral-based practice had previous knowledge of vaginal pessaries. Few patients had heard about pessaries from any source other than a physician or other health care provider. Patients presented with a negative impression of pessaries and a high level of aversion to pessary use. Patients who indicated they would decline pessary use reported a lower level of education and were more likely to have previously seen a gynecologist for evaluation of their condition. These data may inform physician counseling efforts.
Authors: Michael Heit; Chris Rosenquist; Patrick Culligan; Carol Graham; Miles Murphy; Susan Shott Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 7.661