Literature DB >> 26829344

The Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry: Purpose and Development.

Catherine S Bradley1, Anthony G Visco, Emily E Weber LeBrun, Matthew D Barber.   

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common problem that negatively impacts women's quality of life. A variety of surgeries exist for POP treatment, including procedures performed with and without mesh augmentation. The growing use of mesh in prolapse surgeries in the 2000s was associated with increasing reports of complications, resulting in Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Safety Notifications, and in 2012, the FDA ordered transvaginal mesh manufacturers to conduct prospective studies to evaluate longer-term outcomes. These requirements provided incentives and an environment conducive to collaboration. American Urogynecologic Society leaders collaborated with device manufacturers, the FDA, and other professional organizations to establish the Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry (PFDR), a collection of interrelated registries, which could meet manufacturers' needs but also allow surgeons to track individual and aggregate outcomes for quality improvement. The PFDR was developed and launched by American Urogynecologic Society with objectives of (1) collecting, storing, and analyzing clinical data related to POP treatment; (2) establishing common data elements and quality metrics; and (3) providing a framework for external stakeholders to conduct POP research. The PFDR includes industry-sponsored studies, as well as 2 options for volunteer registry participation, the PFDR-Quality Improvement and PFDR-Research. The PFDR promotes quality improvement and national benchmarking and will provide real-world comparative safety and effectiveness data for prolapse surgeries. The PFDR can serve as a model for collaboration between medical practitioners, researchers, industry, and federal agencies and may allow progress toward our similar goal of high-quality surgical care of women with prolapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26829344     DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  8 in total

Review 1.  Host-biomaterial interactions in mesh complications after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Roxanna E Abhari; Matthew L Izett-Kay; Hayley L Morris; Rufus Cartwright; Sarah J B Snelling
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Outcomes collected in female pelvic floor surgical procedure registries and databases: a scoping review.

Authors:  Rasa Ruseckaite; Justin O Daly; Joanne Dean; Susannah Ahern
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Generic Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Seeking Care for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Catherine S Bradley; Heidi W Brown; Stuart S Shippey; Robert E Gutman; Uduak U Andy; Ladin A Yurteri-Kaplan; Bela Kudish; Allen Mehr; Amy O'Boyle; Raymond T Foster; Jennifer T Anger; Patrick Ten Eyck; Pamela A Moalli
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.913

4.  An evaluation of the Manufacturer And User Facility Device Experience database that inspired the United States Food and Drug Administration's Reclassification of transvaginal mesh.

Authors:  Jason M Sandberg; Ian Gray; Amy Pearlman; Ryan P Terlecki
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2018-01-29

5.  Landscape of Cardiovascular Device Registries in the United States.

Authors:  Prashant V Rajan; Jessica N Holtzman; Aaron S Kesselheim; Robert W Yeh; Daniel B Kramer
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 6.  Trials of transvaginal mesh devices for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic database review of the US FDA approval process.

Authors:  Carl J Heneghan; Ben Goldacre; Igho Onakpoya; Jeffrey K Aronson; Tom Jefferson; Annette Pluddemann; Kamal R Mahtani
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Long-term active surveillance of implantable medical devices: an analysis of factors determining whether current registries are adequate to expose safety and efficacy problems.

Authors:  Samprit Banerjee; Bruce Campbell; Josh Rising; Allan Coukell; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2019-07-03

8.  Evaluation of the acceptability of patient-reported outcome measures in women following pelvic floor procedures.

Authors:  Rasa Ruseckaite; Claire Bavor; Lucy Marsh; Joanne Dean; Oliver Daly; Dora Vasiliadis; Susannah Ahern
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.440

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.