| Literature DB >> 26829185 |
Xiaogang Yu1, Weiwei Chen1, Zhenzhen Wei1, Tianhong Ren1, Xin Yang1, Xiaodan Yu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effect of different ways of zinc supplementation on spatial learning and memory remains unclear.Entities:
Keywords: learning and memory; rat; zinc deficiency; zinc supplementation
Year: 2016 PMID: 26829185 PMCID: PMC4734033 DOI: 10.3402/fnr.v60.29467
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Nutr Res ISSN: 1654-661X Impact factor: 3.894
Fig. 1Trial profile demonstrating number of dams and pups in each group that were fed with Zn-deficient diet (Zinc 2 µg/g) or control diet (Zinc 25 µg/g). CO=control; PF=pair fed; ZD=zinc deprived; OZS=oral zinc supplementation; IZS=injection zinc supplementation; ICO=injection control.
Experiment zinc supplementation design of six groups
| Group | Pregnancy Zn | Lactation Zn (till day 21) | Weaning Zn (days 21–35) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CO (controls) | 25 µg Zn/g feed | 25 µg Zn/g feed | 25 µg Zn/g feed |
| PF (pair fed) | 25 µg Zn/g feed, but the amount of food is the same as in the ZD group | 25 µg Zn/g feed, but the amount of food is same as in the ZD group | 25 µg Zn/g feed, but the amount of food is same as in the ZD group |
| ZD (Zn deficient) | 2 µg Zn/g feed | 2 µg Zn/g feed | 2 µg Zn/g feed |
| OZS (Oral Zn) | 2 µg Zn/g feed | 2 µg Zn/g feed | 25 µg Zn/g feed |
| IZS (intravenous Zn) | 2 µg Zn/g feed | 2 µg Zn/g feed | Zn-deficient diet, 2.5 mg ZnSO4 intravenously |
| ICO (intravenous control) | 2 µg Zn/g feed | 2 µg Zn/g feed | Zn-deficient diet Injection without Zn |
The effect of zinc supplementation on serum zinc and gain of body weight in rats
| Rats | Group | Serum zinc (µg/l) | Gain of body weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal | CO (6) | 1038.50±68.87 | 70.50±5.96 |
| PF (6) | 998.67±75.34 | 61.67±9.09 | |
| ZD (6) | 657.83±60.83 | 12.26±1.45 | |
| OZS (6) | 661.00±61.88 | 10.83±1.94 | |
| IZS (6) | 684.33±21.12 | 12.05±2.44 | |
| ICO (6) | 659.50±59.94 | 11.83±2.34 | |
| 54.80 | 211.37 | ||
| <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Pups | CO (12) | 1427.50±155.38 | 55.50±9.29 |
| PF (12) | 1376.83±156.67 | 46.35±8.64 | |
| ZD (12) | 568.86±57.93 | 10.33±2.35 | |
| OZS (12) | 1508.75±157.13 | 59.42±9.27 | |
| IZS (12) | 1843.75±341.33 | 17.83±6.27 | |
| ICO (12) | 559.14±67.71 | 10.30±1.68 | |
| 101.96 | 129.09 | ||
| <0.001 | <0.001 |
Maternal rats’ serum zinc was measured at postnatal day 21, while pups’ serum zinc was measured at postnatal day 35. Data are expressed as the mean±standard deviation. CO=control; PF=pair fed; ZD=zinc deprived; OZS=oral zinc supplementation; IZS=injection zinc supplementation; ICO=injection control; ()=number of rats.
Comparison between two groups:
compared with CO and PF, p<0.05
compared with CO, p<0.05
compared with ICO, p<0.05.
Fig. 2Box plots showing median Escape Latency (a) and Path Length (b) for each group for 4 days in Morris water maze test. Boxes show interquartile ranges, and I bars represent highest and lowest values. The horizontal lines indicate significant comparisons at post-hoc analysis. CO=control; PF=pair fed; ZD=zinc deprived; OZS=oral zinc supplementation; IZS=injection zinc supplementation; ICO=injection control.
Fig. 3The escape latency (a) and Path length (b) for each animal during each training day. Data are means for 12 pups/group. From the second training day, the changes in the ZD, IZS, and ICO groups were not as obvious as those in the PF, CO, and OZS groups (p<0.05). CO=control; PF=pair fed; ZD=zinc deprived; OZS=oral zinc supplementation; IZS=injection zinc supplementation; ICO=injection control.