Literature DB >> 26829077

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Management of Limb Spasticity: A Systematic Review.

Patricia Branco Mills1, Farhana Dossa.   

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for management of limb spasticity. Randomized controlled trials were searched using electronic databases through July 2015. Fourteen randomized controlled trials were included, involving 544 participants. Intervention protocols fit within three categories: 1) TENS vs. no TENS or placebo TENS (n = 7), 2) TENS vs. another TENS protocol or another intervention for spasticity management (n = 7), and 3) TENS as an adjunct to another intervention for spasticity management (n = 4). There was level 1 and 2 evidence for TENS improving spasticity-related outcome measures within the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health domains of body structure and function (e.g., Modified Ashworth Scale) as well as activity (e.g., gait). Better responses in outcome measures in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health activity domain were seen when TENS was used in combination with active therapy (e.g., exercise and task-related training) vs. as a single therapeutic modality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26829077     DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  8 in total

Review 1.  Does TENS Reduce the Intensity of Acute and Chronic Pain? A Comprehensive Appraisal of the Characteristics and Outcomes of 169 Reviews and 49 Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Carole A Paley; Priscilla G Wittkopf; Gareth Jones; Mark I Johnson
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 2.430

2.  Comparison of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) for spasticity in spinal cord injury - A pilot randomized cross-over trial.

Authors:  Anjali Sivaramakrishnan; John M Solomon; Natarajan Manikandan
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 3.  The translational landscape in spinal cord injury: focus on neuroplasticity and regeneration.

Authors:  Thomas H Hutson; Simone Di Giovanni
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 4.  A Comparison of FES and SCS for Neuroplastic Recovery After SCI: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions.

Authors:  Lynsey D Duffell; Nicholas de Neufvillle Donaldson
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Is somatosensory electrical stimulation effective in relieving spasticity? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marco Antonio Cavalcanti Garcia; Claudia Domingues Vargas
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 6.  Effectiveness of Upper Limb Wearable Technology for Improving Activity and Participation in Adult Stroke Survivors: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jack Parker; Lauren Powell; Susan Mawson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 7.  Resolving Long-Standing Uncertainty about the Clinical Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) to Relieve Pain: A Comprehensive Review of Factors Influencing Outcome.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.430

8.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the management of calf muscle spasticity in cerebral palsy: A pilot study.

Authors:  Delali Logosu; Thomas A Tagoe; Patrick Adjei
Journal:  IBRO Neurosci Rep       Date:  2021-10-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.