Literature DB >> 26828831

Similarity in relationships as niche construction: Choice, stability, and influence within dyads in a free choice environment.

Angela J Bahns1, Christian S Crandall2, Omri Gillath2, Kristopher J Preacher3.   

Abstract

A series of field studies focused on the role of similarity as niche construction in friendships. Using a free-range dyad harvest method, we collected 11 independent samples with 1,523 interacting pairs, and compared dyad members' personality traits, attitudes, values, recreational activities, and alcohol and drug use. Within-dyad similarity was statistically significant on 86% of variables measured. To determine whether similarity was primarily attributable to niche construction (i.e., selection) or social influence, we tested whether similarity increased as closeness, intimacy, discussion, length of relationship, and importance of the attitude increased. There were no effects on similarity of closeness, relationship length, or discussion of the attitude. There were quite modest effects of intimacy, and a reliable effect of the shared importance of the attitude. Because relationship length, intimacy, closeness, and discussion can all serve as markers of opportunity for, or potency of social influence, these data are consistent with the "niche construction" account of similarity. In 2 follow-up controlled longitudinal field studies, participants interacted with people they did not know from their large lecture classes, and at a later time completed a survey of attitudes, values, and personality traits. Interacting pairs were not more similar than chance, but for the 23% of dyads that interacted beyond the first meeting, there was significant similarity within dyad members. These 2 lines of inquiry converge to suggest that similarity is mainly due to niche construction, and is most important in the early stages of a relationship; its importance to further relationship development wanes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26828831     DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  5 in total

1.  Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies.

Authors:  Samantha Joel; Paul W Eastwick; Colleen J Allison; Ximena B Arriaga; Zachary G Baker; Eran Bar-Kalifa; Sophie Bergeron; Gurit E Birnbaum; Rebecca L Brock; Claudia C Brumbaugh; Cheryl L Carmichael; Serena Chen; Jennifer Clarke; Rebecca J Cobb; Michael K Coolsen; Jody Davis; David C de Jong; Anik Debrot; Eva C DeHaas; Jaye L Derrick; Jami Eller; Marie-Joelle Estrada; Ruddy Faure; Eli J Finkel; R Chris Fraley; Shelly L Gable; Reuma Gadassi-Polack; Yuthika U Girme; Amie M Gordon; Courtney L Gosnell; Matthew D Hammond; Peggy A Hannon; Cheryl Harasymchuk; Wilhelm Hofmann; Andrea B Horn; Emily A Impett; Jeremy P Jamieson; Dacher Keltner; James J Kim; Jeffrey L Kirchner; Esther S Kluwer; Madoka Kumashiro; Grace Larson; Gal Lazarus; Jill M Logan; Laura B Luchies; Geoff MacDonald; Laura V Machia; Michael R Maniaci; Jessica A Maxwell; Moran Mizrahi; Amy Muise; Sylvia Niehuis; Brian G Ogolsky; C Rebecca Oldham; Nickola C Overall; Meinrad Perrez; Brett J Peters; Paula R Pietromonaco; Sally I Powers; Thery Prok; Rony Pshedetzky-Shochat; Eshkol Rafaeli; Erin L Ramsdell; Maija Reblin; Michael Reicherts; Alan Reifman; Harry T Reis; Galena K Rhoades; William S Rholes; Francesca Righetti; Lindsey M Rodriguez; Ron Rogge; Natalie O Rosen; Darby Saxbe; Haran Sened; Jeffry A Simpson; Erica B Slotter; Scott M Stanley; Shevaun Stocker; Cathy Surra; Hagar Ter Kuile; Allison A Vaughn; Amanda M Vicary; Mariko L Visserman; Scott Wolf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The occurrence and correlates of emotional interdependence in romantic relationships.

Authors:  Laura Sels; Jed Cabrieto; Emily Butler; Harry Reis; Eva Ceulemans; Peter Kuppens
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2019-09-12

3.  Examining similarities in eating pathology, negative affect, and perfectionism among peers: A social network analysis.

Authors:  K Jean Forney; Teresa Schwendler; Rose Marie Ward
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Do masks affect social interaction?

Authors:  Christian S Crandall; Angela J Bahns; Omri Gillath
Journal:  J Appl Soc Psychol       Date:  2022-09-06

5.  Observational learning of fear in real time procedure.

Authors:  Michał Szczepanik; Anna M Kaźmierowska; Jarosław M Michałowski; Marek Wypych; Andreas Olsson; Ewelina Knapska
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.