Literature DB >> 26828716

Management of localized and advanced prostate cancer in Canada: A lifetime cost and quality-adjusted life-year analysis.

Chiranjeev Sanyal1, Armen G Aprikian1,2, Fabio L Cury1,3, Simone Chevalier1,2, Alice Dragomir1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, the literature to date lacks studies examining lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of prostate cancer (PCa) management strategies that integrate localized and advanced disease. The objective of the current study was to assess lifetime costs and QALYs associated with contemporary PCa management strategies across risk groups by integrating localized and advanced disease.
METHODS: The authors' validated Markov chain Monte Carlo model was used to predict lifetime direct costs and QALYs. The health states modeled were active surveillance, initial treatments (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy), PCa recurrence, PCa recurrence free, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and death (cause specific/other causes). Data regarding treatment distribution, state transition probabilities, adverse effects of management options, costs, utilities, and disutilities were derived from the published literature.
RESULTS: The total cost per patient for the overall cohort increased from $18,503 at 5 years to $28,032 and $39,143, respectively, at 10 years and 15 years. Furthermore, the results indicated the influence of risk group on total cost, with the high-risk group accruing the maximum per patient cost followed by the intermediate-risk and low-risk groups. Active surveillance was found to confer the most QALYs (12.5 years) and was the least costly strategy ($18,452) for individuals at low risk. For all risk groups, radical prostatectomy was less costly and conferred modestly more QALYs compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy modalities.
CONCLUSIONS: Public health care systems in Canada and elsewhere are operating under budget constraints to allocate finite resources. The findings of the current study might inform discussions concerning budget planning to provide health care services.
© 2016 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  costs; decision analysis; health economics; outcomes research; prostate cancer; quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26828716     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  5 in total

Review 1.  Robotic Surgical System for Radical Prostatectomy: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-07-07

2.  US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses.

Authors:  Glen Gejerman; Patrick Ciccone; Martin Goldstein; Vincent Lanteri; Burton Schlecker; John Sanzone; Michael Esposito; Sergey Rome; Michael Ciccone; Eric Margolis; Robert Simon; Yijun Guo; Sri-Ram Pentakota; Hossein Sadeghi-Nejad
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-11-02

3.  Cost-effectiveness analyses and cost analyses in castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Grochtdreis; Hans-Helmut König; Alexander Dobruschkin; Gunhild von Amsberg; Judith Dams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  How to measure temporal changes in care pathways for chronic diseases using health care registry data.

Authors:  Eugenio Ventimiglia; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Lars Lindhagen; Pär Stattin; Hans Garmo
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 5.  Genetics and biology of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guocan Wang; Di Zhao; Denise J Spring; Ronald A DePinho
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.