Literature DB >> 26827700

Very few exclusive percepts for contrast-modulated stimuli during binocular rivalry.

Jan Skerswetat1, Monika A Formankiewicz2, Sarah J Waugh2.   

Abstract

Binocular rivalry properties for contrast-modulated (CM) gratings were examined to gain insight into their locus of processing. Two orthogonally orientated gratings were presented, one to each eye. Perceptual change rates, proportions of exclusivity and mixed percepts, and mean durations were calculated. Stimuli were noiseless luminance-defined (L), luminance-modulated noise (LM) and contrast-modulated noise (CM) gratings with sizes of 1, 2 and 4deg and spatial frequencies of 4, 2 and 1c/deg, respectively. For the LM and CM gratings, binary noise was fully correlated between eyes. Maximum producible modulations were used (1.0 for CM, 0.78 for LM and 0.98 for L stimuli). In a control experiment, contrasts of LM gratings were reduced until the multiples over detection threshold were similar to those of CM stimuli. Trial durations of 120s were analyzed. Exclusive visibility decreased with increasing stimulus size regardless of the stimulus type. Even with visibilities at similar multiples above detection threshold, significantly lower proportions of exclusive percepts and perceptual changes were found for CM, compared to LM gratings. The results obtained with dichoptically presented orthogonal CM gratings are significantly different from those obtained for orthogonal gratings presented to one eye. CM stimuli therefore do engage in binocular rivalry but with different characteristics to those found for LM stimuli. These results suggest that CM stimuli are processed by a mechanism that promotes binocular combination rather than rivalry, and therefore may involve cells in a higher visual area than those that initially process LM information.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Binocular rivalry; Binocular vision; Contrast-modulation; First-order; Mixed percepts; Second-order

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26827700     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  Visual consciousness dynamics in adults with and without autism.

Authors:  Jan Skerswetat; Peter J Bex; Simon Baron-Cohen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Transcranial random noise stimulation and exercise do not modulate ocular dominance plasticity in adults with normal vision.

Authors:  Xiaoxin Chen; Kennedy Hall; William R Bobier; Benjamin Thompson; Arijit Chakraborty
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.004

3.  Interocular ND filter suppression: Eccentricity and luminance polarity effects.

Authors:  Akash S Chima; Monika A Formankiewicz; Sarah J Waugh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Contrast-modulated stimuli produce more superimposition and predominate perception when competing with comparable luminance-modulated stimuli during interocular grouping.

Authors:  Jan Skerswetat; Monika A Formankiewicz; Sarah J Waugh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Levelt's laws do not predict perception when luminance- and contrast-modulated stimuli compete during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Jan Skerswetat; Monika A Formankiewicz; Sarah J Waugh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.