Literature DB >> 26827613

The influence of ultrasound measurement techniques on the age-related differences in Achilles tendon size.

Andrew J Tweedell1, Eric D Ryan2, Michael J Scharville3, Joseph G Rosenberg4, Eric J Sobolewski5, Craig R Kleinberg6.   

Abstract

Achilles tendon (AT) properties change with age, however the extent to which aging influences the size of the AT may be influenced by the measurement technique. The purpose of this study was to 1) examine the age-related differences in AT size using measures of cross-sectional area (CSA) and thickness, and 2) to determine the test-retest reliability and minimum difference (MD) values of these measures. The size of the AT was examined in 19 young (19.79 ± 2.3 years) and 18 older (69.4 ± 3.1 years) healthy men on two separate occasions using an ultrasonography. The CSA and thickness of the AT were determined by separate transverse and longitudinal scans on the right leg at the same distance from the medial malleolus, respectively. Prior to and after accounting for body mass, AT CSA was larger (P ≤ 0.01) in the older men (64.49 ± 13.87 mm(2)) when compared to the younger men (44.12 ± 16.04 mm(2)), however there were no differences in AT thickness between age groups (P=0.96). In addition, there was no systematic error (P>0.05) between testing days, and the intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement (expressed as a % of the mean), and MD values for CSA and thickness ranged from 0.80-0.98, 5.46-8.68%, and 5.65-7.94 mm(2) and 0.51-0.86 mm, respectively between both groups. These findings suggest that the reliability of the CSA and thickness measurements were similar, however, CSA was a more sensitive measure to detect the age-related changes of AT size.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Cross-sectional area; Reliability; Thickness

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26827613     DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2016.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Gerontol        ISSN: 0531-5565            Impact factor:   4.032


  4 in total

1.  Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are not interchangeable to assess the Achilles tendon cross-sectional-area.

Authors:  Annika Kruse; Savvas Stafilidis; Markus Tilp
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Quantitative ultrasound imaging of Achilles tendon integrity in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals: reliability and minimal detectable change.

Authors:  Marie-Josée Nadeau; Amélie Desrochers; Martin Lamontagne; Christian Larivière; Dany H Gagnon
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 3.  Alterations in Leg Extensor Muscle-Tendon Unit Biomechanical Properties With Ageing and Mechanical Loading.

Authors:  Christopher McCrum; Pamela Leow; Gaspar Epro; Matthias König; Kenneth Meijer; Kiros Karamanidis
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  On the morphological relations of the Achilles tendon and plantar fascia via the calcaneus: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  A Singh; J Zwirner; F Templer; D Kieser; S Klima; N Hammer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.