Literature DB >> 26827272

[Computerized ranking test in three French universities: Staff experience and students' feedback].

D Roux1, G Meyer2, F Cymbalista3, J-D Bouaziz4, G Falgarone5, A Tesniere6, J Gervais7, A Cariou8, R Peffault de Latour9, M Marat10, E Moenaert7, T Guebli11, O Rodriguez10, A Lefort12, D Dreyfuss13, D Hajage14, J-D Ricard13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The year 2016 will be pivotal for the evaluation of French medical students with the introduction of the first computerized National Ranking Test (ECNi). The SIDES, online electronic system for medical student evaluation, was created for this purpose. All the universities have already organized faculty exams but few a joint computerized ranking test at several universities simultaneously. We report our experience on the organization of a mock ECNi by universities Paris Descartes, Paris Diderot and Paris 13.
METHODS: Docimological, administrative and technical working groups were created to organize this ECNi. Students in their fifth year of medical studies, who will be the first students to sit for the official ECNi in 2016, were invited to attend this mock exam that represented more than 50% of what will be proposed in 2016. A final electronic questionnaire allowed a docimological and organizational evaluation by students. An analysis of ratings and rankings and their distribution on a 1000-point scale were performed.
RESULTS: Sixty-four percent of enrolled students (i.e., 654) attended the three half-day exams. No difference in total score and ranking between the three universities was observed. Students' feedback was extremely positive. Normalized over 1000 points, 99% of students were scored on 300 points only. Progressive clinical cases were the most discriminating test.
CONCLUSION: The organization of a mock ECNi involving multiple universities was a docimological and technical success but required an important administrative, technical and teaching investment.
Copyright © 2016 Société nationale française de médecine interne (SNFMI). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computerization; Discrimination; Evaluation; Examen classant national; Informatisation; National ranking test; SIDES; Évaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26827272     DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2015.12.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Med Interne        ISSN: 0248-8663            Impact factor:   0.728


  3 in total

1.  Pharmacology and Therapeutics Education in the European Union Needs Harmonization and Modernization: A Cross-sectional Survey Among 185 Medical Schools in 27 Countries.

Authors:  D J Brinkman; J Tichelaar; M Okorie; L Bissell; T Christiaens; R Likic; R Mačìulaitis; J Costa; E J Sanz; B I Tamba; S R Maxwell; M C Richir; M A van Agtmael
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Impact of panelists' experience on script concordance test scores of medical students.

Authors:  Olivier Peyrony; Alice Hutin; Jennifer Truchot; Raphaël Borie; David Calvet; Adrien Albaladejo; Yousrah Baadj; Pierre-Emmanuel Cailleaux; Martin Flamant; Clémence Martin; Jonathan Messika; Alexandre Meunier; Mariana Mirabel; Victoria Tea; Xavier Treton; Sylvie Chevret; David Lebeaux; Damien Roux
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Predictive factors of success at the French National Ranking Examination (NRE): a retrospective study of the student performance from a French medical school.

Authors:  Martin Lhuaire; Moustapha Dramé; Mikael Hivelin; Thomas Levasseur; Quentin Maestraggi; Vincent Hunsinger; Peter Abrahams; Laurent Lantieri; Daniele Sommacale
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 2.463

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.