| Literature DB >> 26826679 |
Abdalmajeed M Alajlouni1, Amer J Al Malahmeh2, Reiko Kiwamoto3, Sebastiaan Wesseling3, Ans E M F Soffers3, Ala A A Al-Subeihi4, Jacques Vervoort5, Ivonne M C M Rietjens3.
Abstract
The present study developed physiologically-based kinetic (PBK) models for the alkenylbenzene apiol in order to facilitate risk assessment based on read-across from the related alkenylbenzene safrole. Model predictions indicate that in rat liver the formation of the 1'-sulfoxy metabolite is about 3 times lower for apiol than for safrole. These data support that the lower confidence limit of the benchmark dose resulting in a 10% extra cancer incidence (BMDL10) that would be obtained in a rodent carcinogenicity study with apiol may be 3-fold higher for apiol than for safrole. These results enable a preliminary risk assessment for apiol, for which tumor data are not available, using a BMDL10 value of 3 times the BMDL10 for safrole. Based on an estimated BMDL10 for apiol of 5.7-15.3 mg/kg body wt per day and an estimated daily intake of 4 × 10(-5) mg/kg body wt per day, the margin of exposure (MOE) would amount to 140,000-385,000. This indicates a low priority for risk management. The present study shows how PBK modelling can contribute to the development of alternatives for animal testing, facilitating read-across from compounds for which in vivo toxicity studies on tumor formation are available to compounds for which these data are unavailable.Entities:
Keywords: Apiol; Margin of exposure; PBK modelling; Read-across; Risk assessment; Safrole
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26826679 DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2016.01.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Chem Toxicol ISSN: 0278-6915 Impact factor: 6.023