Literature DB >> 26826528

The effect of terminal sterilization on the material properties and in vivo remodeling of a porcine dermal biologic scaffold.

Christopher L Dearth1, Timothy J Keane2, Christopher A Carruthers2, Janet E Reing3, Luai Huleihel3, Christian A Ranallo3, Elizabeth W Kollar3, Stephen F Badylak4.   

Abstract

Biologic scaffolds composed of extracellular matrix are commonly used in a variety of surgical procedures. The Food and Drug Administration typically regulates biologic scaffolds as medical devices, thus requiring terminal sterilization prior to clinical use. However, to date, no consensus exists for the most effective yet minimally destructive sterilization protocol for biologic scaffold materials. The objective of the present study was to characterize the effect of ethylene oxide, gamma irradiation and electron beam (e-beam) irradiation on the material properties and the elicited in vivo remodeling response of a porcine dermal biologic scaffold. Outcome measures included biochemical, structural, and mechanical properties as well as cytocompatibility in vitro. In vivo evaluation utilized a rodent model to examine the host response to the materials following 7, 14, and 35 days. The host response to each experimental group was determined by quantitative histologic methods and by immunolabeling for macrophage polarization (M1/M2). In vitro results show that increasing irradiation dosage resulted in a dose dependent decrease in mechanical properties compared to untreated controls. Ethylene oxide-treated porcine dermal ECM resulted in decreased DNA content, extractable total protein, and bFGF content compared to untreated controls. All ETO treated, gamma irradiated, and e-beam irradiated samples had similar cytocompatibility scores in vitro. However, in vivo results showed that increasing dosages of e-beam and gamma irradiation elicited an increased rate of degradation of the biologic scaffold material following 35 days. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The FDA typically regulates biologic scaffolds derived from mammalian tissues as medical devices, thus requiring terminal sterilization prior to clinical use. However, there is little data and no consensus for the most effective yet minimally destructive sterilization protocol for such materials. The present study characterized the effect of common sterilization methods: ethylene oxide, gamma irradiation and electron beam irradiation on the material properties and the elicited in vivo remodeling response of a porcine dermal biologic scaffold. The results of the study will aid in the meaningful selection of sterilization methods for biologic scaffold materials.
Copyright © 2016 Acta Materialia Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extracelluar matrix; Terminal sterilization

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26826528     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  15 in total

Review 1.  The extracellular matrix of the gastrointestinal tract: a regenerative medicine platform.

Authors:  George S Hussey; Timothy J Keane; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds as Immunomodulatory Biomaterials<sup/>.

Authors:  Jenna L Dziki; Luai Huleihel; Michelle E Scarritt; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 3.  Extracellular matrix hydrogel therapies: In vivo applications and development.

Authors:  Martin T Spang; Karen L Christman
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 8.947

4.   Extracellular Matrix-Based Biomaterials and Their Influence Upon Cell Behavior.

Authors:  Madeline C Cramer; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 5.  Biomaterial strategies for generating therapeutic immune responses.

Authors:  Sean H Kelly; Lucas S Shores; Nicole L Votaw; Joel H Collier
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 6.  Utility of extracellular matrix powders in tissue engineering.

Authors:  Lauren Edgar; Afnan Altamimi; Marta García Sánchez; Riccardo Tamburrinia; Amish Asthana; Carlo Gazia; Giuseppe Orlando
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.316

7.  In Vitro Analysis of Histology, Mechanics, and Safety of Radiation-free Pre-hydrated Human Acellular Dermal Matrix.

Authors:  Ji Young Kim; Kyung Min Yang; Ji Hyun Youn; Heejun Park; Hyung Min Hahn; Il Jae Lee
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.588

Review 8.  Sterilization and disinfection methods for decellularized matrix materials: Review, consideration and proposal.

Authors:  Meihan Tao; Tianrang Ao; Xiaoyan Mao; Xinzhu Yan; Rabia Javed; Weijian Hou; Yang Wang; Cong Sun; Shuang Lin; Tianhao Yu; Qiang Ao
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-02-27

9.  The Impact of γ-Irradiation and EtO Degassing on Tissue Remodeling of Collagen-based Hybrid Tubular Templates.

Authors:  Marije Sloff; Heinz P Janke; Paul K J D de Jonge; Dorien M Tiemessen; Barbara B M Kortmann; Silvia M Mihaila; Paul J Geutjes; Wout F J Feitz; Egbert Oosterwijk
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2018-07-25

Review 10.  Recent Trends in Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Bioinks for 3D Printing: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Kevin Dzobo; Keolebogile Shirley Caroline M Motaung; Adetola Adesida
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.