Literature DB >> 26826457

Water usage for natural gas production through hydraulic fracturing in the United States from 2008 to 2014.

Huan Chen1, Kimberly E Carter2.   

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing has promoted the exploitation of shale oil and natural gas in the United States (U.S.). However, the large amounts of water used in hydraulic fracturing may constrain oil and natural gas production in the shale plays. This study surveyed the amounts of freshwater and recycled produced water used to fracture wells from 2008 to 2014 in Arkansas, California, Colorado, Kansas, Louisiana, Montana, North Dakota, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, West Virginia, and Wyoming. Results showed that the annual average water volumes used per well in most of these states ranged between 1000 m(3) and 30,000 m(3). The highest total amount of water was consumed in Texas with 457.42 Mm(3) of water used to fracture 40,521 wells, followed by Pennsylvania with 108.67 Mm(3) of water used to treat 5127 wells. Water usages ranged from 96.85 Mm(3) to 166.10 Mm(3) annually in Texas from 2012 to 2014 with more than 10,000 wells fractured during that time. The percentage of water used for hydraulic fracturing in each state was relatively low compared to water usages for other industries. From 2009 to 2014, 6.55% (median) of the water volume used in hydraulic fracturing contained recycled produced water or recycled hydraulic fracturing wastewater. 10.84% (median) of wells produced by hydraulic fracturing were treated with recycled produced water. The percentage of wells where recycled wastewater was used was lower, except in Ohio and Arkansas, where more than half of the wells were fractured using recycled produced water. The median recycled wastewater volume in produced wells was 7127 m(3) per well, more than half the median value in annual water used per well 11,259 m(3). This indicates that, for wells recycling wastewater, more than half of their water use consisted of recycled wastewater.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Criticality ratio; Flowback rate; Hydraulic fracturing; Recycled wastewater; Water scarcity; Water use

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26826457     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  3 in total

1.  Shale gas development and infant health: Evidence from Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Elaine L Hill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Unconventional Oil and Gas Energy Systems: An Unidentified Hotspot of Antimicrobial Resistance?

Authors:  Maria Fernanda Campa; Amy K Wolfe; Stephen M Techtmann; Ann-Marie Harik; Terry C Hazen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Competitive adsorption phenomenon in shale gas displacement processes.

Authors:  Jihong Shi; Liang Gong; Shuyu Sun; Zhaoqin Huang; Bin Ding; Jun Yao
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.361

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.