Literature DB >> 26826362

Towards a meaningful assessment of marine ecological impacts in life cycle assessment (LCA).

John S Woods1, Karin Veltman2, Mark A J Huijbregts3, Francesca Verones4, Edgar G Hertwich5.   

Abstract

Human demands on marine resources and space are currently unprecedented and concerns are rising over observed declines in marine biodiversity. A quantitative understanding of the impact of industrial activities on the marine environment is thus essential. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a widely applied method for quantifying the environmental impact of products and processes. LCA was originally developed to assess the impacts of land-based industries on mainly terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. As such, impact indicators for major drivers of marine biodiversity loss are currently lacking. We review quantitative approaches for cause-effect assessment of seven major drivers of marine biodiversity loss: climate change, ocean acidification, eutrophication-induced hypoxia, seabed damage, overexploitation of biotic resources, invasive species and marine plastic debris. Our review shows that impact indicators can be developed for all identified drivers, albeit at different levels of coverage of cause-effect pathways and variable levels of uncertainty and spatial coverage. Modeling approaches to predict the spatial distribution and intensity of human-driven interventions in the marine environment are relatively well-established and can be employed to develop spatially-explicit LCA fate factors. Modeling approaches to quantify the effects of these interventions on marine biodiversity are less well-developed. We highlight specific research challenges to facilitate a coherent incorporation of marine biodiversity loss in LCA, thereby making LCA a more comprehensive and robust environmental impact assessment tool. Research challenges of particular importance include i) incorporation of the non-linear behavior of global circulation models (GCMs) within an LCA framework and ii) improving spatial differentiation, especially the representation of coastal regions in GCMs and ocean-carbon cycle models.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecosystem quality; Human interventions; Impact pathways; Life cycle assessment; Marine biodiversity; Pollution

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26826362     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.12.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  5 in total

Review 1.  Critical Review of Eutrophication Models for Life Cycle Assessment.

Authors:  Ben Morelli; Troy R Hawkins; Briana Niblick; Andrew D Henderson; Heather E Golden; Jana E Compton; Ellen J Cooter; Jane C Bare
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Natural biotic resources in LCA: Towards an impact assessment model for sustainable supply chain management.

Authors:  Eleonora Crenna; Sara Sozzo; Serenella Sala
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 9.297

Review 3.  The Psychology of Sustainable Seafood Consumption: A Comprehensive Approach.

Authors:  Isabel G M Richter; Christian A Klöckner
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2017-09-28

4.  Environmental co-benefits and adverse side-effects of alternative power sector decarbonization strategies.

Authors:  Gunnar Luderer; Michaja Pehl; Anders Arvesen; Thomas Gibon; Benjamin L Bodirsky; Harmen Sytze de Boer; Oliver Fricko; Mohamad Hejazi; Florian Humpenöder; Gokul Iyer; Silvana Mima; Ioanna Mouratiadou; Robert C Pietzcker; Alexander Popp; Maarten van den Berg; Detlef van Vuuren; Edgar G Hertwich
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Dredging Intensity: A Spatio-Temporal Indicator for Managing Marine Resources.

Authors:  Henry Bokuniewicz; Sung Gheel Jang
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.266

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.