Hanna Grundström1, Preben Kjølhede2, Carina Berterö3, Siw Alehagen3. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vrinnevi Hospital, Norrköping 603 79, Sweden; Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping 581 83, Sweden. Electronic address: hanna.grundstrom@liu.se. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping 581 83, Sweden. 3. Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping 581 83, Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify and describe the experiences of healthcare professionals when meeting women with symptoms that might indicate endometriosis. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 gynecologists, six general practitioners and nine midwives working at one university hospital, one central hospital, one private gynecology clinic and five healthcare centers in south-east Sweden. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and analyzed using qualitative conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Three clusters were identified: the corroborating encounter, the normal variation of menstruation cycles, and the suspicion of endometriosis. The healthcare professionals tried to make a corroborating encounter by acknowledging the woman, taking time to listen, and giving an explanation for the problems. Healthcare professionals had different ways to determine what was normal as regards menstrual pain, ovulation pain and dyspareunia. They also needed to have the competence to act and react when the symptoms indicated endometriosis. CONCLUSIONS: Meeting women with symptoms that might indicate endometriosis is challenging and demands a certain level of competence from healthcare professionals. Sometimes the symptoms are camouflaged as "normal" menstruation pain, making it hard to satisfy the needs of this patient group.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify and describe the experiences of healthcare professionals when meeting women with symptoms that might indicate endometriosis. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 gynecologists, six general practitioners and nine midwives working at one university hospital, one central hospital, one private gynecology clinic and five healthcare centers in south-east Sweden. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and analyzed using qualitative conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Three clusters were identified: the corroborating encounter, the normal variation of menstruation cycles, and the suspicion of endometriosis. The healthcare professionals tried to make a corroborating encounter by acknowledging the woman, taking time to listen, and giving an explanation for the problems. Healthcare professionals had different ways to determine what was normal as regards menstrual pain, ovulation pain and dyspareunia. They also needed to have the competence to act and react when the symptoms indicated endometriosis. CONCLUSIONS: Meeting women with symptoms that might indicate endometriosis is challenging and demands a certain level of competence from healthcare professionals. Sometimes the symptoms are camouflaged as "normal" menstruation pain, making it hard to satisfy the needs of this patient group.
Authors: Sanjay K Agarwal; Oscar Antunez-Flores; Warren G Foster; Ashwaq Hermes; Shahrokh Golshan; Ahmed M Soliman; Amanda Arnold; Rebecca Luna Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 2.809
Authors: Astha Malik; Justin Sinclair; Cecilia H M Ng; Caroline A Smith; Jason Abbott; Mike Armour Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 2.809