Marta Michalczuk1, Beata Urban2, Beata Chrzanowska-Grenda2, Monika Oziębło-Kupczyk2, Alina Bakunowicz-Łazarczyk2, Małgorzata Krętowska3. 1. Department of Paediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Medical University of Białystok, Waszyngtona 17, 15-274, Białystok, Poland. martaa.michalczuk@gmail.com. 2. Department of Paediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Medical University of Białystok, Waszyngtona 17, 15-274, Białystok, Poland. 3. Faculty of Computer Science, Białystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A, 15-351, Białystok, Poland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The authors examined macular function in preterm-born children, using multifocal ERG (mfERG). Possible alterations in P1 amplitudes, P1 amplitudes density and P1 implicit time between school-age children with history of prematurity and their peers were researched. The correlations between parameters of mfERG responses and birth weight, gestational age, macular volume and central macular thickness were verified. METHODS: A group of 18 preterm-born school-age children were analyzed (mean age 10.18 ± 1.21 years). The study group was compared to the group of 15 peers born appropriate for gestational age (mean age 10.8 ± 1.52 years). The mfERG was evaluated in all children. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences for P1 amplitudes from ring 1 (p = 0.0001) and P1 amplitudes density from ring 1 (p = 0.0001). Calculating the correlation coefficients, we receive significant results for P1 amplitudes from ring 1 versus gestational age (r = 0.54; p = 0.026), birth weight (r = 0.54; p = 0.026) and central macular thickness (r = -0.62; p = 0.008), and for P1 amplitudes density from ring 1 versus central macular thickness (r = -0.51; p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that P1 amplitudes and P1 amplitudes density vary in preterm-born children in comparison with their peers born appropriate for gestational age, which might suggest discreet macular dysfunction. The correlation between low birth weight, early gestational age, central macular thickness and mFERG components from ring 1 might evidence that decreased bipolar cells density caused by premature birth is the result of altered development of central retina reflecting in structural anomalies of the fovea.
PURPOSE: The authors examined macular function in preterm-born children, using multifocal ERG (mfERG). Possible alterations in P1 amplitudes, P1 amplitudes density and P1 implicit time between school-age children with history of prematurity and their peers were researched. The correlations between parameters of mfERG responses and birth weight, gestational age, macular volume and central macular thickness were verified. METHODS: A group of 18 preterm-born school-age children were analyzed (mean age 10.18 ± 1.21 years). The study group was compared to the group of 15 peers born appropriate for gestational age (mean age 10.8 ± 1.52 years). The mfERG was evaluated in all children. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences for P1 amplitudes from ring 1 (p = 0.0001) and P1 amplitudes density from ring 1 (p = 0.0001). Calculating the correlation coefficients, we receive significant results for P1 amplitudes from ring 1 versus gestational age (r = 0.54; p = 0.026), birth weight (r = 0.54; p = 0.026) and central macular thickness (r = -0.62; p = 0.008), and for P1 amplitudes density from ring 1 versus central macular thickness (r = -0.51; p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that P1 amplitudes and P1 amplitudes density vary in preterm-born children in comparison with their peers born appropriate for gestational age, which might suggest discreet macular dysfunction. The correlation between low birth weight, early gestational age, central macular thickness and mFERG components from ring 1 might evidence that decreased bipolar cells density caused by premature birth is the result of altered development of central retina reflecting in structural anomalies of the fovea.
Authors: Daniel X Hammer; Nicusor V Iftimia; R Daniel Ferguson; Chad E Bigelow; Teoman E Ustun; Amber M Barnaby; Anne B Fulton Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-01-25 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Donald C Hood; Michael Bach; Mitchell Brigell; David Keating; Mineo Kondo; Jonathan S Lyons; Michael F Marmor; Daphne L McCulloch; Anja M Palmowski-Wolfe Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2011-10-30 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Avroy A Fanaroff; Barbara J Stoll; Linda L Wright; Waldemar A Carlo; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Ann R Stark; Charles R Bauer; Edward F Donovan; Sheldon B Korones; Abbot R Laptook; James A Lemons; William Oh; Lu-Ann Papile; Seetha Shankaran; David K Stevenson; Jon E Tyson; W Kenneth Poole Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Anna E C Molnar; Sten O Andréasson; Eva K B Larsson; Hanna M Åkerblom; Gerd E Holmström Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 7.389