Literature DB >> 26824593

Surgical results of cranioplasty with a polymethylmethacrylate customized cranial implant in pediatric patients: a single-center experience.

Pietro Fiaschi1,2, Marco Pavanello3, Alessia Imperato3, Villiam Dallolio4, Andrea Accogli3,5, Valeria Capra3, Alessandro Consales3, Armando Cama3, Gianluca Piatelli3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Cranioplasty is a reconstructive procedure used to restore skull anatomy and repair skull defects. Optimal skull reconstruction is a challenge for neurosurgeons, and the strategy used to achieve the best result remains a topic of debate, especially in pediatric patients for whom the continuing skull growth makes the choice of material more difficult. When the native bone flap, which is universally accepted as the preferred option in pediatric patients, is unavailable, the authors' choice of prosthetic material is a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) implant designed using a custom-made technique. In this paper the authors present the results of their clinical series of 12 custom-made PMMA implants in pediatric patients. METHODS A retrospective study of the patients who had undergone cranioplasty at Gaslini Children's Hospital between 2006 and 2013 was conducted. A total of 12 consecutive cranioplasties in 12 patients was reviewed, in which a patient-specific PMMA implant was manufactured using a virtual 3D model and then transformed into a physical model using selective laser sintering or 3D printing. All patients or parents were administered a questionnaire to assess how the patient/parent judged the aesthetic result. RESULTS Patient age at craniectomy ranged from 5 months to 12.5 years, with a mean age of 84.33 months at cranioplasty. The mean extension of the custom-made plastic was 56.83 cm(2). The mean time between craniectomy and cranioplasty was 9.25 months. The mean follow-up duration was 55.7 months. No major complications were recorded; 3 patients experienced minor/moderate complications (prosthesis dislocation, granuloma formation, and fluid collection). CONCLUSIONS In this patient series, PMMA resulted in an extremely low complication rate and the custom-made technique was associated with an excellent grade of patient or parent satisfaction on long-term follow up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PMMA = polymethylmethacrylate; cranioplasty; custom-made technique; pediatric reconstructive surgery; polymethylmethacrylate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26824593     DOI: 10.3171/2015.10.PEDS15489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr        ISSN: 1933-0707            Impact factor:   2.375


  20 in total

Review 1.  Surgical applications of three-dimensional printing: a review of the current literature & how to get started.

Authors:  Don Hoang; David Perrault; Milan Stevanovic; Alidad Ghiassi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

2.  A testbed for optimizing electrodes embedded in the skull or in artificial skull replacement pieces used after injury.

Authors:  JingLe Jiang; Amar R Marathe; Jennifer C Keene; Dawn M Taylor
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 3.  Problems of reconstructive cranioplasty after traumatic brain injury in children.

Authors:  Paolo Frassanito; Gianpiero Tamburrini; Luca Massimi; Simone Peraio; Massimo Caldarelli; Concezio Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Cranioplasties following craniectomies in children-a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Vita M Klieverik; Kai J Miller; Kuo Sen Han; Ash Singhal; Michael Vassilyadi; Charles J Touchette; Alexander G Weil; Peter A Woerdeman
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  From decompressive craniectomy to cranioplasty and beyond-a pediatric neurosurgery perspective.

Authors:  Thomas Beez; Christopher Munoz-Bendix; Sebastian Alexander Ahmadi; Hans-Jakob Steiger; Kerim Beseoglu
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 6.  Cranioplasty after craniectomy in pediatric patients-a systematic review.

Authors:  Vita M Klieverik; Kai J Miller; Ash Singhal; Kuo Sen Han; Peter A Woerdeman
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Three-dimensional printing in medicine: a systematic review of pediatric applications.

Authors:  Caitlin A Francoisse; Anne M Sescleifer; Wilson T King; Alexander Y Lin
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 3.756

8.  Comparison of two different titanium cranioplasty methods: Custom-made titanium prostheses versus precurved titanium mesh.

Authors:  Domenico Policicchio; Gina Casu; Giosuè Dipellegrini; Artan Doda; Giampiero Muggianu; Riccardo Boccaletti
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-06-13

Review 9.  Establishing a point-of-care additive manufacturing workflow for clinical use.

Authors:  Georges E Daoud; Dante L Pezzutti; Calvin J Dolatowski; Ricardo L Carrau; Mary Pancake; Edward Herderick; Kyle K VanKoevering
Journal:  J Mater Res       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.089

10.  Feasibility of customizing titanium implant with three-dimensional CT imaging of low dose in skull.

Authors:  Min-Xia Yang; Bing Chen; Ya-Ping Zhang; Zhen-Hua Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.