OBJECTIVE: There is a paucity of studies on adherence to growth hormone treatment in growth hormone deficient (GHD) adults. Therefore, this study reports on adherence to GH-replacement therapy in adults with GHD, with a special focus on the course and potential predictors of nonadherence. DESIGN: Retrospective single-centre cohort study. PATIENTS: From the local patient database, 179 suitable patients with GHD were identified. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was adherence assessed by calculating the percentage of available prescription data in comparison with recommended GH dosages over a mean follow-up period of 92·4 months. Patients were categorized into five adherence categories ranging from <20% to >80%. RESULTS: Mean overall adherence was 74·0%, with 52·9% of patients falling into the adherence group of >80% and 8·8% of <20%. There was a significant drop in adherence (9·8%) between the first and second years of treatment (P < 0·001). Patients with childhood-onset GHD were significantly less adherent to GH treatment than patients with adult-onset GHD (62·0% vs 77·0%, P = 0·012); however, this finding was no longer significant after including age as a covariate. Frequency of IGF-1 levels lying outside the age- and sex-specific reference range was not a good indicator for adherence. CONCLUSION: Although overall adherence was relatively high in our study sample, there is a significant amount of patients who should be regarded as nonadherent. This applies in particular to younger patients. Treating physicians should be aware of the fact that IGF-1 levels do not seem to be a good indicator for adherence.
OBJECTIVE: There is a paucity of studies on adherence to growth hormone treatment in growth hormone deficient (GHD) adults. Therefore, this study reports on adherence to GH-replacement therapy in adults with GHD, with a special focus on the course and potential predictors of nonadherence. DESIGN: Retrospective single-centre cohort study. PATIENTS: From the local patient database, 179 suitable patients with GHD were identified. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was adherence assessed by calculating the percentage of available prescription data in comparison with recommended GH dosages over a mean follow-up period of 92·4 months. Patients were categorized into five adherence categories ranging from <20% to >80%. RESULTS: Mean overall adherence was 74·0%, with 52·9% of patients falling into the adherence group of >80% and 8·8% of <20%. There was a significant drop in adherence (9·8%) between the first and second years of treatment (P < 0·001). Patients with childhood-onset GHD were significantly less adherent to GH treatment than patients with adult-onset GHD (62·0% vs 77·0%, P = 0·012); however, this finding was no longer significant after including age as a covariate. Frequency of IGF-1 levels lying outside the age- and sex-specific reference range was not a good indicator for adherence. CONCLUSION: Although overall adherence was relatively high in our study sample, there is a significant amount of patients who should be regarded as nonadherent. This applies in particular to younger patients. Treating physicians should be aware of the fact that IGF-1 levels do not seem to be a good indicator for adherence.
Authors: Charlotte Höybye; Andreas F H Pfeiffer; Diego Ferone; Jens Sandahl Christiansen; David Gilfoyle; Eva Dam Christoffersen; Eva Mortensen; Jonathan A Leff; Michael Beckert Journal: Endocr Connect Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 3.335
Authors: Margaret C S Boguszewski; Adriane A Cardoso-Demartini; Cesar Luiz Boguszewski; Wassim Chemaitilly; Claire E Higham; Gudmundur Johannsson; Kevin C J Yuen Journal: Pituitary Date: 2021-07-25 Impact factor: 4.107