Literature DB >> 26824167

The Noncentral Chi-square Distribution in Misspecified Structural Equation Models: Finite Sample Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation.

Patrick J Curran, Kenneth A Bollen, Pamela Paxton, James Kirby, Feinian Chen.   

Abstract

The noncentral chi-square distribution plays a key role in structural equation modeling (SEM). The likelihood ratio test statistic that accompanies virtually all SEMs asymptotically follows a noncentral chi-square under certain assumptions relating to misspecification and multivariate distribution. Many scholars use the noncentral chi-square distribution in the construction of fit indices, such as Steiger and Lind's (1980) Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) or the family of baseline fit indices (e.g., RNI, CFI), and for the computation of statistical power for model hypothesis testing. Despite this wide use, surprisingly little is known about the extent to which the test statistic follows a noncentral chi-square in applied research. Our study examines several hypotheses about the suitability of the noncentral chi-square distribution for the usual SEM test statistic under conditions commonly encountered in practice. We designed Monte Carlo computer simulation experiments to empirically test these research hypotheses. Our experimental conditions included seven sample sizes ranging from 50 to 1000, and three distinct model types, each with five specifications ranging from a correct model to the severely misspecified uncorrelated baseline model. In general, we found that for models with small to moderate misspecification, the noncentral chi-square distribution is well approximated when the sample size is large (e.g., greater than 200), but there was evidence of bias in both mean and variance in smaller samples. A key finding was that the test statistics for the uncorrelated variable baseline model did not follow the noncentral chi-square distribution for any model type across any sample size. We discuss the implications of our findings for the SEM fit indices and power estimation procedures that are based on the noncentral chi-square distribution as well as potential directions for future research.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 26824167     DOI: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3701_01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  5 in total

1.  SEM with simplicity and accuracy.

Authors:  Peter M Bentler
Journal:  J Consum Psychol       Date:  2010-04

2.  An Empirical Evaluation of the Use of Fixed Cutoff Points in RMSEA Test Statistic in Structural Equation Models.

Authors:  Feinian Chen; Patrick J Curran; Kenneth A Bollen; James Kirby; Pamela Paxton
Journal:  Sociol Methods Res       Date:  2008-01-01

3.  Marital conflict in early childhood and adolescent disordered eating: emotional insecurity about the marital relationship as an explanatory mechanism.

Authors:  Melissa W George; Amanda J Fairchild; E Mark Cummings; Patrick T Davies
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2014-06-20

4.  Using Structural Equation Modeling to Assess Functional Connectivity in the Brain: Power and Sample Size Considerations.

Authors:  Georgios Sideridis; Panagiotis Simos; Andrew Papanicolaou; Jack Fletcher
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.821

5.  Autonomy versus support: self-reliance and help-seeking for mental health problems in young people.

Authors:  Amelia Ishikawa; Debra Rickwood; Emily Bariola; Navjot Bhullar
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.519

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.