Literature DB >> 26824145

Parameterization of a disease progression simulation model for sequentially treated metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer patients.

Vakaramoko Diaby1, Askal A Ali1, Georges Adunlin2, Christine G Kohn3, Alberto J Montero4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Background The objective of this study is twofold: 1) to propose a simulation model for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) which could further be used to assess the overall cost-effectiveness of the treatment sequences that would maximize survival of patients, and 2) to estimate transitional probabilities between treatment lines required to parameterize the simulation model, in the absence of individual patient data (IPD). Methods Individual patient data (IPD) were reconstructed for treatment lines composing four treatment sequences. Parametric models were tested to select the model that best fits the IPD. The transitional probability equations, used for disease progression modeling, were obtained by substituting the parameters of the general equation for transitional probabilities by the parameters estimated from fitted distributions. Results The log-logistic model best fitted the reconstructed data for progression-free and overall survival curves for each line of treatment. The shapes and scales of the log-logistic models were used to develop the transitional probability equations for the HER2+ mBC simulation model. KEY LIMITATIONS: The estimation of the transitional probabilities depends heavily on the accuracy of the IPD reconstruction. Nonetheless, analytical and graphical tests can be performed to check the face validity of the reconstructed data. Additionally, sensitivity analyses can be conducted to test the impact of uncertainty surrounding the estimated parameters defining equations for transitional probabilities. Conclusion The results of this study can be used as input in model-based economic evaluations of sequential therapy for HER2+ mBC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disease progression modeling; HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer; Individual patient data reconstruction; Sequential therapy; Transitional probabilities

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26824145      PMCID: PMC4959115          DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2016.1149056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  23 in total

1.  Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Victor M Montori; Marc F Swiontkowski; Deborah J Cook
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of individual- and aggregate-level data.

Authors:  A J Sutton; D Kendrick; C A C Coupland
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.

Authors:  Ashley P Jones; Richard D Riley; Paula R Williamson; Anne Whitehead
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Sunil Verma; David Miles; Luca Gianni; Ian E Krop; Manfred Welslau; José Baselga; Mark Pegram; Do-Youn Oh; Véronique Diéras; Ellie Guardino; Liang Fang; Michael W Lu; Steven Olsen; Kim Blackwell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Changing Treatment Paradigms in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Cesar A Santa-Maria; William J Gradishar
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 31.777

6.  Comparative effectiveness without head-to-head trials: a method for matching-adjusted indirect comparisons applied to psoriasis treatment with adalimumab or etanercept.

Authors:  James E Signorovitch; Eric Q Wu; Andrew P Yu; Charles M Gerrits; Evan Kantor; Yanjun Bao; Shiraz R Gupta; Parvez M Mulani
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Subtyping of breast cancer by immunohistochemistry to investigate a relationship between subtype and short and long term survival: a collaborative analysis of data for 10,159 cases from 12 studies.

Authors:  Fiona M Blows; Kristy E Driver; Marjanka K Schmidt; Annegien Broeks; Flora E van Leeuwen; Jelle Wesseling; Maggie C Cheang; Karen Gelmon; Torsten O Nielsen; Carl Blomqvist; Päivi Heikkilä; Tuomas Heikkinen; Heli Nevanlinna; Lars A Akslen; Louis R Bégin; William D Foulkes; Fergus J Couch; Xianshu Wang; Vicky Cafourek; Janet E Olson; Laura Baglietto; Graham G Giles; Gianluca Severi; Catriona A McLean; Melissa C Southey; Emad Rakha; Andrew R Green; Ian O Ellis; Mark E Sherman; Jolanta Lissowska; William F Anderson; Angela Cox; Simon S Cross; Malcolm W R Reed; Elena Provenzano; Sarah-Jane Dawson; Alison M Dunning; Manjeet Humphreys; Douglas F Easton; Montserrat García-Closas; Carlos Caldas; Paul D Pharoah; David Huntsman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (CLEOPATRA study): overall survival results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.

Authors:  Sandra M Swain; Sung-Bae Kim; Javier Cortés; Jungsil Ro; Vladimir Semiglazov; Mario Campone; Eva Ciruelos; Jean-Marc Ferrero; Andreas Schneeweiss; Adam Knott; Emma Clark; Graham Ross; Mark C Benyunes; José Baselga
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 9.  Dasatinib and nilotinib for imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukaemia: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  G Rogers; M Hoyle; J Thompson Coon; T Moxham; Z Liu; M Pitt; K Stein
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 10.  Indirect comparisons: a review of reporting and methodological quality.

Authors:  Sarah Donegan; Paula Williamson; Carrol Gamble; Catrin Tudur-Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of 1st through 3rd line sequential targeted therapy in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Vakaramoko Diaby; Georges Adunlin; Askal A Ali; Simon B Zeichner; Gilberto de Lima Lopes; Christine G Kohn; Alberto J Montero
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Reviewing the quality, health benefit and value for money of chemotherapy and targeted therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Xavier Ghislain Léon Victor Pouwels; Bram L T Ramaekers; Manuela A Joore
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  The promise of Immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment.

Authors:  Howard L Kaufman; Michael B Atkins; Prasun Subedi; James Wu; James Chambers; T Joseph Mattingly; Jonathan D Campbell; Jeff Allen; Andrea E Ferris; Richard L Schilsky; Daniel Danielson; J Leonard Lichtenfeld; Linda House; Wendy K D Selig
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 13.751

4.  Cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab versus docetaxel, cisplatin and trastuzumab in new adjuvant therapy of breast cancer in china.

Authors:  Qiaoping Xu; Li Yuanyuan; Zhu Jiejing; Liu Jian; Li Qingyu; Chen Lingya; Luo Ying; Shi Changchen; Li Yangling; Yan Wei
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2021-02-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.