| Literature DB >> 26823661 |
Dmitry V Politov1, Maryana M Belokon1, Yuri S Belokon1, Tatyana A Polyakova1, Anna V Shatokhina1, Elena A Mudrik1, Anna B Azarova2, Mikhail V Filippov2, Konstantin A Shestibratov2.
Abstract
Testing systems for molecular identification of micropropagated elite aspen (Populus tremula L.) genotypes were developed on the base on microsatellite (SSR) loci. Out of 33 tested microsatellite loci, 14 were selected due to sustainable PCR amplification and substantial variability in elite clones of aspen aimed for establishment of fast-rotated forest plantations. All eight tested clones had different multilocus genotypes. Among 114 trees from three reference native stands located near the established plantations, 80 haplotypes were identified while some repeated genotypes were attributed to natural clones which appeared as a result of sprouting. The selected set of SSR markers showed reliable individual identification with low probability of appearance of identical aspen genotypes (a minimum of 4.8 · 10(-10) and 1 × 10(-4) for unrelated and related individuals, resp.). Case studies demonstrating practical applications of the test system are described including analysis of clonal structure and levels of genetic diversity in three natural aspen stands growing in the regions where plantations made of elite clones were established.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26823661 PMCID: PMC4707373 DOI: 10.1155/2015/261518
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Plant Genomics ISSN: 1687-5389
Elite aspen and hybrid clones and their characteristics.
| Original genotype | Putative species/hybrid identity | Origin | Description | Clones and clonal lineages obtained based on original genotypes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PtV22 | Putatively | Minsk Oblast, Belarus, breeding form obtained in Institute of Forest, National Academy of Belarus, Gomel, Belarus, provided by V. E. Padutov | Diploid green-bark aspen form. Characterized by fast growth and resistance to heart rot caused by pathogen fungus | Ptv22-1, Ptv22-2, Ptv22-3, 21mut, 2mut, 14mut, 4mut, 12mut |
|
| ||||
| Pt |
| Leningrad Oblast, Russia, breeding form obtained in St. Petersburg Research Institute for Forestry, provided by D. A. Shabunin | Diploid giant aspen form. Characterized by fast growth and resistance to heart rot caused by pathogen fungus | Pt2, Pt3 |
|
| ||||
| F2 |
| Kostroma Oblast, Russia, breeding form obtained by S. N. Bagayev, provided by D. A. Shabunin | Diploid female clone. Highly productive (plus 51% by sum of stem cross section squares and plus 43% by growing stock). Increased wood density of 475 kg/m3[ | F2-1, F2-2, F2-3 |
|
| ||||
| 47 |
| Latvian State Forest Research Institute “Silava,” Latvia, provided by Dr. Arnis Gailis | Diploid aspen form. Productivity of 180–200 m3/haat age 12 under density of 1100 stems/ha. Characterized by resistance to heart rot caused by pathogen fungus | 47-1, 47-1-1-31, 47-1-1-22, 47-1-2-27, 47-1-1-19, 47-1-2-53 |
|
| ||||
| С-control |
| -“- | Diploid hybrid form. Productivity of 180–200 m3/ha at age 12 under density of 1100 stems/ha [ | С-1, С-2, С-3 |
|
| ||||
| 23 |
| -“- | Diploid hybrid form. Maximal productivity of 200–250 m3/ha demonstrated at age 12 under density of 1100 stems/ha [ | L23-1, L23-2, L23-3 |
|
| ||||
| 4 |
| -“- | Maximal productivity of 250–300 m3/ha demonstrated at age 12 under density of 2500 stems/ha [ | L4-1, L4-2, L4-3 |
|
| ||||
| No. 3-understory |
| Republic of Tatarstan, breeding form by A. H. Gaziulllin, provided by N. R. Garipov | Triploid aspen form. Characterized by fast growth and resistance to heart rot caused by pathogen fungus | No. 3-understory-1 |
Figure 1Map of location of plantations made of elite clones and corresponding native aspen stands used as reference populations. (1) Prisady, (2) Voronezh, and (3) Yoshkar-Ola.
Microsatellite loci tested for PCR amplification in aspen.
| Loci | Primer sequences (5′- 3′) | Repeat motif | Fragment size (bp)3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ORPM141 | F- GGGCTGCAGCAGATATTGA | (GCTC)4 | 146–162 |
|
| |||
| ORPM181 | F- AGCAGAGATCGATGCTGAGG | (TTTA)4 | 205 |
|
| |||
| ORPM361 | F- AGCCTCCAAACACCATGAAC | (GAAA)4 | 213 |
|
| |||
| ORPM601 | F- ATAGCGCCAGAAGCAAAAAC | (AAT)5 | 212 |
|
| |||
| ORPM791 | F- GAAGCTGAAAACAACAACAAACA | (AAT)4 | 160 |
|
| |||
| ORPM811 | F- GCTGCAGCCAAACAAAGC | (TATT)4 | 142–158 |
|
| |||
| ORPM841 | F- CTGCAGCCTTACCACCATTT | (AAG)4 | 171 |
|
| |||
| ORPM861 | F- CCACATCCATAGCTCTGCAAC | (CTT)5 | 204 |
|
| |||
| ORPM1071 | F- AATCTGGTGGCTTGCCTCT | (TAAA)4 | 190 |
|
| |||
| ORPM1171 | F- CCCCCTAATTACCTTGGAAAC | (ATTA)4 | 210 |
|
| |||
| ORPM1581 | F- GCTGAAACATCCTTCATGGTC | (TTTC)4 | 200 |
|
| |||
| ORPM1931 | F- CCGCTGGATTTGTTTGTTTT | (ATTTT)4 | 187–207 |
|
| |||
| ORPM2021 | F- TCGCAAAAGATTCTCCCAGT | (TAA)5 | 184–190 |
|
| |||
| ORPM2061 | F- CCGTGGCCATTGACTCTTTA | (GCT)7 | 190–208 |
|
| |||
| ORPM2201 | F- AGCTAGCCTGTCGTCAAGGA | (TTTA)6 | 178–222 |
|
| |||
| ORPM2961 | F- CGAAGCCATTGACCCAGTAT | (GTTCTG)4 | 199 |
|
| |||
| ORPM3121 | F- GTGGGGATCAATCCAAAAGA | (CCT)6 | 194 |
|
| |||
| ORPM3661 | F- CCTTGAGGGGACACTTCGAT | (TTA)5 | 156 |
|
| |||
| ORPM3711 | F- CCGGACTCTCACAAATCTCC | (TCTT)6 | 192–200 |
|
| |||
| ORPM3721 | F- AGCTCTTCTGCTGGTGCTGT | (TCTT)5 | 190 |
|
| |||
| ORPM4151 | F- CTCGGTGCAAATATCGGTTC | (GGCG)4 | 225 |
|
| |||
| ORPM4841 | F- CAAAATGGCAATCCAAGGTT | (TTAA)4 | 190–206 |
|
| |||
| ORPM4881 | F- CTCCAGCCGCTTCTATCCTT | (TTA)6 | 200 |
|
| |||
| ORPM4961 | F- CAGCAGTGCAAGCTCCTAAA | (GGA)4 | 185 |
|
| |||
| WPMS142 | F- CAGCCGCAGCCACTGAGAAATC | (CGT)28 | 215–287 |
|
| |||
| WPMS152 | F- CAACAAACCATCAATGAAGAAGAC | (CCT)14 | 201–219 |
|
| |||
| WPMS162 | F- CTCGTACTATTTCCGATGATGACC | (GTC)8 | 139–184 |
|
| |||
| WPMS172 | F- ACATCCGCCAATGCTTCGGTGTTT | (CAC)15 | 122–146 |
|
| |||
| WPMS182 | F- CTTCACATAGGACATAGCAGCATC | (GTG)13 | 219–248 |
|
| |||
| WPMS192 | F- AGCCACAGCAAATTCAGATGATGC | (CAG)28 | 180–234 |
|
| |||
| WPMS202 | F- GTGCGCACATCTATGACTATCG | (TTCTGG)8 | 210–222 |
|
| |||
| WPMS212 | F- TGCTGATGCAAAAGATTTAG | (GCT)45 | 287–326 |
|
| |||
| WPMS222 | F- ACATGCTACGTGTTTGGAATG | (TGA)23 | 100–135 |
Comments: 1Tuskan et al., 2004 [15]; 2Smulders et al., 2001 [16]; 3by literature data in different Populus species (P. tremula, P. x canescens, and P. alba).
Results of testing of microsatellite loci in aspen.
| Locus | PCR amplification | Fragment size range (bp) | Number of alleles | Status1 | Included in testing system |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORPM14 | Yes | 146–162 | 4 | P | No |
| ORPM18 | No | — | — | N | No |
| ORPM36 | Yes | 217 | 1 | M | No |
| ORPM60 | No | — | — | N | No |
| ORPM79 | No | — | — | N | No |
| ORPM81 | No | — | — | N | No |
| ORPM84 | No | — | — | N | No |
| ORPM86 | Yes | 204–216 | 4 | P | No |
| ORPM107 | No | — | — | N | No |
| ORPM117 | Yes | 218 | 1 | M | No |
| ORPM158 | Yes | 200 | 1 | M | No |
| ORPM193 | Yes | 182–207 | 6 | P | Yes |
| ORPM202 | Yes | 184–193 | 5 | P | Yes |
| ORPM206 | Yes | 190–196 | 3 | P | Yes |
| ORPM220 | Yes | 178–198 | 5 | P | Yes |
| ORPM296 | Yes | 201–183 | 4 | P | Yes |
| ORPM312 | Yes | 189–201 | 4 | P | No |
| ORPM366 | No | — | — | N | No |
| ORPM371 | Yes | 192–200 | 3 | P | No |
| ORPM372 | No | — | — | N | No |
| ORPM415 | Yes | ~280 | 1 | M | No |
| ORPM484 | Yes | 190–206 | 3 | P | No |
| ORPM488 | Yes | 197–203 | 2 | P | No |
| ORPM496 | No | — | — | N | No |
| WPMS14 | Yes | 224–243 | 3 | P | Yes |
| WPMS15 | Yes | 189–207 | 5 | P | Yes |
| WPMS16 | Yes | 139–184 | 9 | P | Yes |
| WPMS17 | Yes | 122–146 | 7 | P | Yes |
| WPMS18 | Yes | 219–248 | 7 | P | Yes |
| WPMS19 | Yes | 210–252 | 9 | P | Yes |
| WPMS20 | Yes | 210–222 | 4 | P | Yes |
| WPMS21 | Yes | 196–240 | 5 | P | Yes |
| WPMS22 | Yes | 115–135 | 3 | P | Yes |
1P: polymorphic, M: monomorphic, and N: no PCR amplification.
Figure 2(a) Electrophoretic patterns of PCR-amplified SSR loci ORPM202, ORPM206, ORPM220, ORPM296, and ORPM312 in aspen. Loci: lanes 1–4: ORPM202; lanes 6–9: ORPM206; lanes 10–13: ORPM220; samples: 1, 6, 10, 15, and 19, aspen from native population; 2, 7, 11, 16, and 20, clone С-control; 3, 8, 12, 18, and 21, clone 47-1; 4, 9, 13, 18, and 22, clone PtV22. Lanes 5, 14, and 23: DNA molecular weight marker (DNA of E. coli plasmid pBR322, digested by restriction endonuclease HpaII). (b) Electrophoretic patterns of PCR-amplified SSR loci WPMS15, WPMS17, WPMS18, WPMS19, WPMS21, and WPMS22 in aspen. Loci: lanes 1–4: WPMS15, lanes 6–9: WPMS17, lanes 10–13: WPMS18, lanes 15–18: WPMS19, lanes 19–22: WPMS21, and lanes 24–27: WPMS22. Samples: 1, 6, 10, 15, 19, and 24, aspen from natural population; 2, 7, 11, 16, 20, and 25, clone С-control; 3, 8, 12, 16, 21, and 26, clone 47-1; 4, 9, 13, 18, 22, and 27, clone PtV22. Lanes 5, 14, and 23, DNA molecular weight marker (DNA of E. coli plasmid pBR322, digested by restriction endonuclease HpaII).
Figure 3Relationship of PI and PIsibs from the number of used loci. 1 represents locus 1, 2 represents loci 1 + 2, and so forth.
Parameters of genetic variability in aspen populations.
| Population |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prisady | Mean | 41 | 6.429 | 3.921 | 0.631 | 0.661 | 0.669 | 0.047 |
| s.e. | 0.850 | 0.602 | 0.059 | 0.044 | 0.045 | 0.065 | ||
| Voronezh | Mean | 25 | 7.429 | 3.970 | 0.580 | 0.687 | 0.701 | 0.188 |
| s.e. | 1.274 | 0.584 | 0.068 | 0.035 | 0.036 | 0.076 | ||
| Yoshkar-Ola | Mean | 13 | 4.643 | 2.738 | 0.522 | 0.567 | 0.590 | 0.109 |
| s.e. | 0.541 | 0.343 | 0.072 | 0.043 | 0.045 | 0.087 | ||
| Total mean | Mean | 26.333 | 6.167 | 3.543 | 0.578 | 0.639 | 0.654 | 0.115 |
| s.e. | 1.791 | 0.558 | 0.308 | 0.038 | 0.024 | 0.025 | 0.044 |
s.e.: standard error.
N: sample size.
N : mean number of alleles.
N : effective number of alleles.
H : observed heterozygosity.
H : expected heterozygosity.
UH : unbiased expected heterozygosity.
F: fixation index (intrapopulation coefficient of inbreeding).
F-statistics for three natural aspen populations.
| Locus |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.158 | 0.230 | 0.086 |
|
| 0.514 | 0.593 | 0.164 |
|
| 0.276 | 0.363 | 0.120 |
|
| 0.066 | 0.096 | 0.032 |
|
| 0.046 | 0.067 | 0.023 |
|
| 0.074 | 0.224 | 0.162 |
|
| −0.187 | −0.144 | 0.036 |
|
| −0.105 | −0.083 | 0.019 |
|
| −0.066 | −0.028 | 0.036 |
|
| 0.305 | 0.322 | 0.025 |
|
| −0.034 | −0.003 | 0.029 |
|
| 0.111 | 0.131 | 0.023 |
|
| −0.057 | −0.027 | 0.028 |
|
| 0.563 | 0.578 | 0.035 |
|
| |||
| Mean | 0.119 | 0.166 | 0.058 |
| s.e. | 0.060 | 0.062 | 0.014 |
s.e.: standard error.