Literature DB >> 26823564

High Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Endometrial Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature.

Vikram Rao Bollineni1, Sigmund Ytre-Hauge2, Oksana Bollineni-Balabay3, Helga Birgitte Salvesen4, Ingfrid Salvesen Haldorsen2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the preoperative assessment of lymph node metastases (LNM) in endometrial cancer patients and for the assessment of endometrial cancer recurrence (ECR) after primary surgical treatment.
METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed on Pubmed/MEDLINE databases for studies reporting the diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for assessment of LNM and ECR published up to August 15, 2015. Twenty-one studies (13 for LNM and 8 for ECR) were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of the (18)F-FDG PET/CT were calculated along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A summary receiver-operating-characteristics curve (SROC) was constructed, and the area under the SROC curve (AUC) was determined along with Q* index.
RESULTS: The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and AUC (with 95% CI) of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for detection of LNM were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63-0.80), 0.94 (95% CI, 0.93-0.96), 10.9 (95% CI, 7.9-15.1), 0.36 (95% CI, 0.27-0.48), 39.7 (95% CI, 21.4-73.6), and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.85-0.99), respectively, whereas the corresponding numbers for detection of ECR were 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98), 0.91 (95% CI, 0.86-0.94), 8.8 (95% CI, 6.0-12.7), 0.08 (95% CI, 0.05-0.15), 171.7 (95% CI, 67.9-434.3), and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98), respectively. The overall diagnostic accuracy (Q* index) in LNM and ECR were 0.88 and 0.93, respectively.
CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET/CT has an excellent diagnostic performance for detecting LNM preoperatively and disease recurrence postoperatively in endometrial cancer patients.
© 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDG; PET and CT; endometrial cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26823564     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.170597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  18 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Geng; Jun Tang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Role of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Preoperative Assessment of Carcinoma Endometrium-a Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Rohini Kulkarni; Rani Akhil Bhat; Vibhawari Dhakharia; Kumar Kallur; Aparna Gangoli
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-11-20

3.  ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Nicole Concin; Carien L Creutzberg; Ignace Vergote; David Cibula; Mansoor Raza Mirza; Simone Marnitz; Jonathan A Ledermann; Tjalling Bosse; Cyrus Chargari; Anna Fagotti; Christina Fotopoulou; Antonio González-Martín; Sigurd F Lax; Domenica Lorusso; Christian Marth; Philippe Morice; Remi A Nout; Dearbhaile E O'Donnell; Denis Querleu; Maria Rosaria Raspollini; Jalid Sehouli; Alina E Sturdza; Alexandra Taylor; Anneke M Westermann; Pauline Wimberger; Nicoletta Colombo; François Planchamp; Xavier Matias-Guiu
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology-IV. Gynecologic and Genitourinary Malignancies.

Authors:  Ahmed Ebada Salem; Gabriel C Fine; Matthew F Covington; Bhasker R Koppula; Richard H Wiggins; John M Hoffman; Kathryn A Morton
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Pre-surgical staging in endometrial cancer: An opportunity for risk stratification and triage?

Authors:  Tony Jose; Amarinder Singh; Shakti Vardhan
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2020-12-14

Review 6.  Different imaging techniques for the detection of pelvic lymph nodes metastasis from gynecological malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi Gong; Qingming Wang; Li Dong; Yiping Jia; Chengge Hua; Fanglin Mi; Chunjie Li
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-02-21

Review 7.  The role of 18F-FDG PET CT in common gynaecological malignancies.

Authors:  Priya Narayanan; Anju Sahdev
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Relationship between the expression of oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor and 18F-FDG uptake in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Chunhua Wu; Ruohua Chen; Lian Xu; Yumei Chen; Yining Wang; Gan Huang; Jianjun Liu
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 9.  Endometrial cancer: an overview of novelties in treatment and related imaging keypoints for local staging.

Authors:  Stefania Rizzo; Marco Femia; Valentina Buscarino; Dorella Franchi; Annalisa Garbi; Vanna Zanagnolo; Maria Del Grande; Lucia Manganaro; Sarah Alessi; Caterina Giannitto; Francesca Ruju; Massimo Bellomi
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Radiomics of the primary tumour as a tool to improve 18F-FDG-PET sensitivity in detecting nodal metastases in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Elisabetta De Bernardi; Alessandro Buda; Luca Guerra; Debora Vicini; Federica Elisei; Claudio Landoni; Robert Fruscio; Cristina Messa; Cinzia Crivellaro
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.