| Literature DB >> 26823418 |
Andrew T Tredennick1, Peter B Adler2, James B Grace3, W Stanley Harpole4, Elizabeth T Borer5, Eric W Seabloom5, T Michael Anderson6, Jonathan D Bakker7, Lori A Biederman8, Cynthia S Brown9, Yvonne M Buckley10, Chengjin Chu11, Scott L Collins12, Michael J Crawley13, Philip A Fay14, Jennifer Firn15, Daniel S Gruner16, Nicole Hagenah17, Yann Hautier18, Andy Hector19, Helmut Hillebrand20, Kevin Kirkman17, Johannes M H Knops21, Ramesh Laungani22, Eric M Lind5, Andrew S MacDougall23, Rebecca L McCulley24, Charles E Mitchell25, Joslin L Moore26, John W Morgan27, John L Orrock28, Pablo L Peri29, Suzanne M Prober30, Anita C Risch31, Martin Schütz31, Karina L Speziale32, Rachel J Standish33, Lauren L Sullivan5, Glenda M Wardle34, Ryan J Williams35, Louie H Yang36.
Abstract
Fraser et al. (Reports, 17 July 2015, p. 302) report a unimodal relationship between productivity and species richness at regional and global scales, which they contrast with the results of Adler et al. (Reports, 23 September 2011, p. 1750). However, both data sets, when analyzed correctly, show clearly and consistently that productivity is a poor predictor of local species richness.Mesh：
Year: 2016 PMID： 26823418 DOI： 10.1126/science.aad6236
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Science ISSN： 0036-8075 Impact factor: 47.728