Wei-Xing Bai1, Bu-Lang Gao2, Tian-Xiao Li3, Zi-Liang Wang1, Dong-Yang Cai1, Liang-Fu Zhu1, Jiang-Yu Xue1, Zhao-Shuo Li1. 1. Stroke Center, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. 2. Department of Medical Research, Shijiazhuang First Hospital, Hebei Medical University, China. 3. Stroke Center, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China litianxiaod@163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and long-term effect of using the Wingspan stent for severe symptomatic atherosclerotic basilar artery stenosis (≥70%). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2007 and April 2013, we had 91 consecutive patients (age range 41-82 years old) with symptomatic severe basilar stenosis (70-99%) who underwent Wingspan stenting at our center. All patients had stenosis-related temporary ischemic attack or strokes. We analyzed the demographic data, pre- and post-procedural cerebral angiography, technical success rate, peri-procedural complications, and clinical and imaging follow-ups. RESULTS: The Wingspan stenting procedure was successful in all patients: The stenosis was reduced from 82.2% ± 5.8% pre-stenting to 15.9% ± 5.7% post-stenting. The 30-day peri-operative rate for stroke or death was 14.3%, which included ischemic stroke in 12 cases (12/91 = 13.2%) and subarachnoid hemorrhage in one case (1/91 = 1.1%), with a fatal or disabling stroke rate of 2.2%. Among the 77 patients with clinical follow-up assessment within 7-60 months (mean 31.3 ± 15.1 months) after stenting, four patients (5.2%) had posterior ischemia, including one patient with disabling ischemic stroke (1.3%) and three patients (3.9%) with temporary ischemic attack. The 2-year cumulative stroke rate was 16% (95% CI: 8.2-23.8%). Among 46 patients with imaging assessments at 3-45 months (mean, 9.5 ± 8.3) post-stenting, six (13.0%) patients had restenosis, including two (2/46 = 4.3%) with symptomatic restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of stenting for patients with severe basilar artery stenosis (> 70%) may lie in lowering the long-term fatal and disabling stroke rate; and as long as the peri-operative stroke rate can be kept at a relatively lower level, patients with severe basilar stenosis can benefit from basilar artery stenting.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and long-term effect of using the Wingspan stent for severe symptomatic atherosclerotic basilar artery stenosis (≥70%). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2007 and April 2013, we had 91 consecutive patients (age range 41-82 years old) with symptomatic severe basilar stenosis (70-99%) who underwent Wingspan stenting at our center. All patients had stenosis-related temporary ischemic attack or strokes. We analyzed the demographic data, pre- and post-procedural cerebral angiography, technical success rate, peri-procedural complications, and clinical and imaging follow-ups. RESULTS: The Wingspan stenting procedure was successful in all patients: The stenosis was reduced from 82.2% ± 5.8% pre-stenting to 15.9% ± 5.7% post-stenting. The 30-day peri-operative rate for stroke or death was 14.3%, which included ischemic stroke in 12 cases (12/91 = 13.2%) and subarachnoid hemorrhage in one case (1/91 = 1.1%), with a fatal or disabling stroke rate of 2.2%. Among the 77 patients with clinical follow-up assessment within 7-60 months (mean 31.3 ± 15.1 months) after stenting, four patients (5.2%) had posterior ischemia, including one patient with disabling ischemic stroke (1.3%) and three patients (3.9%) with temporary ischemic attack. The 2-year cumulative stroke rate was 16% (95% CI: 8.2-23.8%). Among 46 patients with imaging assessments at 3-45 months (mean, 9.5 ± 8.3) post-stenting, six (13.0%) patients had restenosis, including two (2/46 = 4.3%) with symptomatic restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of stenting for patients with severe basilar artery stenosis (> 70%) may lie in lowering the long-term fatal and disabling stroke rate; and as long as the peri-operative stroke rate can be kept at a relatively lower level, patients with severe basilar stenosis can benefit from basilar artery stenting.
Authors: Elad I Levy; Aquilla S Turk; Felipe C Albuquerque; David B Niemann; Beverly Aagaard-Kienitz; Lee Pride; Phil Purdy; Babu Welch; Henry Woo; Peter A Rasmussen; L Nelson Hopkins; Thomas J Masaryk; Cameron G McDougall; David J Fiorella Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: P T L Chiam; R M Samuelson; J Mocco; R A Hanel; A H Siddiqui; L N Hopkins; E I Levy Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2008-09-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: A S Turk; E I Levy; F C Albuquerque; G L Pride; H Woo; B G Welch; D B Niemann; P D Purdy; B Aagaard-Kienitz; P A Rasmussen; L N Hopkins; T J Masaryk; C G McDougall; D Fiorella Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-11-07 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Edgar A Samaniego; Amir Shaban; Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez; Jorge A Roa; David M Hasan; Colin Derdeyn; Biyue Dai; Harold Adams; Enrique Leira Journal: Stroke Vasc Neurol Date: 2019-07-30
Authors: Mark Barahman; Lourdes Alanis; Joseph DiNorcia; John M Moriarty; Justin P McWilliams Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 5.742