| Literature DB >> 26822953 |
Veerle E T Maervoet1,2, Sofie L De Maeseneire3, Fatma G Avci4,5, Joeri Beauprez6, Wim K Soetaert7, Marjan De Mey8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Imbalance in cofactors causing the accumulation of intermediates in biosynthesis pathways is a frequently occurring problem in metabolic engineering when optimizing a production pathway in a microorganism. In our previous study, a single knock-out Citrobacter werkmanii ∆dhaD was constructed for improved 1,3-propanediol (PDO) production. Instead of an enhanced PDO concentration on this strain, the gene knock-out led to the accumulation of the toxic intermediate 3-hydroxypropionaldehyde (3-HPA). The hypothesis was emerged that the accumulation of this toxic intermediate, 3-HPA, is due to a cofactor imbalance, i.e. to the limited supply of reducing equivalents (NADH). Here, this bottleneck is alleviated by rationally engineering cell metabolism to balance the cofactor supply.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26822953 PMCID: PMC4731958 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-016-0421-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Growth rate, PDO yield and metabolite profile of the wild-type (WT) and single knock-outs
| Strains | Growth rate (h−1) | PDO Yield (mol/mol) | Metabolite concentration (mM) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acetate | Ethanol | Lactate | Succinate | |||
| WT | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0.63 ± 0.01 | 38.20 ± 0.83 | 7.08 ± 0.37 | 1.14 ± 0.27 | 4.69 ± 0.14 |
| ∆ | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.59 ± 0.02 | 18.30 ± 1.07 | 0.21 ± 0.14 | BDL | 4.72 ± 0.08 |
| ∆ | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.70 ± 0.01 | 44.30 ± 2.19 | BDL | 4.67 ± 0.31 | 5.93 ± 0.09 |
| ∆ | 0.13 ± 0.00 | 0.65 ± 0.01 | 58.00 ± 1.30 | BDL | 5.27 ± 0.84 | 7.09 ± 0.32 |
C. werkmanii DSM17579 (WT), C. werkmanii ∆ldhA, C. werkmanii ∆adhE::ChlFRT, and C. werkmanii ∆arcA::ChlFRT were cultivated under anaerobic conditions in shake flasks. The values are the average of two experiments with their corresponding standard deviations
BDL below the detection limit
Growth rate, PDO yield, NAD+/NADH-ratio and pH of C. werkmanii knock-outs
| Strains | Growth rate (h−1) | PDO Yield (mol/mol) | NAD+/NADH ratio | Final pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ∆ | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 0.68 ± 0.05 | 4.74 ± 0.14 | 6.43 ± 0.01 |
| ∆ | 0.31 ± 0.03 | 0.84 ± 0.01 | 1.66 ± 0.03 | 6.35 ± 0.02 |
| ∆ | 0.34 ± 0.01 | 0.96 ± 0.01 | 2.20 ± 0.07 | 6.33 ± 0.03 |
| ∆ | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 1.00 ± 0.03 | 2.38 ± 0.15 | 6.80 ± 0.00 |
C. werkmanii ∆dhaD, C. werkmanii ∆dhaD∆ldhA, C. werkmanii ∆dhaD∆adhE::ChlFRT and C. werkmanii ∆dhaD∆ldhA∆adhE::ChlFRT grown anaerobically in shake flasks. The values are the average of two experiments with their corresponding standard deviation
Residual substrate concentration and metabolite profile of C. werkmanii knock-outs
| Strains | Residual concentration (mM) | Metabolite concentration (mM) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycerol | Glucose | PDO | Acetate | Ethanol | Lactate | Succinate | 3-HPA | |
| ∆ | 45.52 ± 1.56 | 0.22 ± 0.03a | 39.80 ± 2.67a | 46.20 ± 0.59a | 18.00 ± 1.22a | 3.10 ± 0.49a | 4.44 ± 0.30a | 24.74 ± 2.48a |
| ∆ | 41.92 ± 0.89 | 2.75 ± 0.20b | 62.90 ± 1.29a,b | 52.40 ± 0.99a,b | 12.50 ± 0.21a,b | 0.87 ± 0.02a,b | 5.11 ± 0.02b | 11.92 ± 1.35a,b |
| ∆ | 44.43 ± 5.37 | 9.08 ± 2.71a | 86.11 ± 7.19a,b,c | 68.12 ± 1.74a,b,c | BDLa,b | 5.46 ± 0.61a,b,c | 6.36 ± 0.61a,b | 4.83 ± 0.21a,b,c |
| ∆ | 52.33 ± 5.63 | 11.05 ± 1.26a,b | 107.20 ± 4.22a,b,c | 75.40 ± 0.69a,b,c | BDLa,b | BDLa,c | 6.07 ± 0.14a | BDLa,b,c |
C. werkmanii ∆dhaD, C. werkmanii ∆dhaD∆ldhA, C. werkmanii ∆dhaD∆adhE::ChlFRT and C. werkmanii ∆dhaD∆ldhA∆adhE::ChlFRT grown anaerobically in shake flasks. The values are the average of two experiments with their corresponding standard deviation
BDL below the detection limit
a, b, cSignificant values calculated by one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test
Fig. 1Profile of the batch fermentation on bioreactor scale with C. werkmanii ∆dhaD∆ldhA∆adhE::ChlFRT. The strain was grown in fermentation medium with 220 mM glucose and 650 mM glycerol under anaerobic conditions. The cell dry weight is estimated from OD600nm measurements as described in the “Methods” section. The symbols in graph a represent () CDW, () glycerol, () glucose, and () PDO; in graph b () acetate, () ethanol, () lactate, () succinate, () formate, and () CO2
Comparison of batch cultivations [glycerol (Gly), or glycerol and glucose (Glu + Gly)] with C. werkmanii ∆dhaD∆ldhA∆adhE::ChlFRT
| Strain | Yield (mol PDO/mol glycerol) | Residual concentration (mM) | Metabolite concentration (mM) | CDW | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycerol | Glucose | PDO | Acetate | Ethanol | Lactate | Succinate | |||
| Gly | 0.72 ± 0.05 | 93.14 ± 1.97 | ND | 404.80 ± 8.51 | 166.76 ± 3.49 | BDL | 5.86 ± 0.01 | 25.74 ± 0.44 | 38.83 ± 2.07 |
| Glu + Gly | 0.73 ± 0.01 | BDL | 16.51 ± 0.03 | 422.01 ± 19.37 | 266.19 ± 11.50 | 33.11 ± 4.74 | 10.60 ± 0.38 | 62.81 ± 2.76 | 64.82 ± 2.84 |
The strain was grown on bioreactor scale in fermentation medium under anaerobic conditions. The cell dry weight is estimated from OD600nm measurements as described in “Methods” section. The values are the average of two experiments with their corresponding standard deviations
ND not determined, BDL below detection limit
The glycerol dehydrogenase and glycerol kinase activity (mU/mg protein) of C. werkmanii ∆dhaD∆ldhA∆adhE::ChlFRT
| Carbon source | Enzyme activity (mU/mg protein) | |
|---|---|---|
| Glycerol dehydrogenase | Glycerol kinase | |
| Glycerol | 72.70 ± 1.76 | 10.67 ± 1.34 |
| Glycerol + Glucose | 26.80 ± 0.18 | 13.85 ± 0.20 |
The strain was grown under anaerobic conditions in fermentation medium with glycerol only or with 0.33 molar ratio glucose to glycerol in batch cultivations on bioreactor scale. The values are the averages of two experiments with their corresponding standard deviations
Fig. 2Amino acid homologies between putative glycerol dehydrogenases (PGDH) and known glycerol dehydrogenases (DHAD) coded by dhaD. The amino acids of CF_DHAD (Citrobacter freundii, GenBank: EHL83381.1), CW_DHAD (C. werkmanii DSM17579, GenBank: AFX65883.1), C_PGDH (Citrobacter sp., GenBank: WP_042998939.1), CY_PGDH (C. youngae ATCC29220, GenBank: EFE08361.1), CK_PGDH (C. koseri ATCC BAA-895, GenBank: ABV13669.1), and EC_PGDH (Escherichia coli K12 MG1655, GenBank: NP_415132.1) are aligned. Matching amino acids are marked under the alignment. The putative NAD-binding sites are boxed, the putative glycerol binding sites are marked with an arrow, and the putative manganese binding sites are orange
Bacterial strains used in this work
| Strains | Reference |
|---|---|
|
| DSMZ, Braunschweig, |
|
| Maervoet et al. [ |
|
| This study |
|
| This study |
|
| This study |
|
| This study |
|
| This study |
|
| This study |
ChlFRT chloramphenicol cassette flanked by FRT sites