Literature DB >> 26822353

Computational modeling for addiction medicine: From cognitive models to clinical applications.

Woo Young Ahn1, Junyi Dai2, Jasmin Vassileva3, Jerome R Busemeyer4, Julie C Stout5.   

Abstract

Decision-making tasks that have good ecological validity, such as simulated gambling tasks, are complex, and performance on these tasks represents a synthesis of several different underlying psychological processes, such as learning from experience, and motivational processes such as sensitivity to reward and punishment. Cognitive models can be used to break down performance on these tasks into constituent processes, which can then be assessed and studied in relation to clinical characteristics and neuroimaging outcomes. Whether it will be possible to improve treatment success by targeting these constituent processes more directly remains unexplored. We review the development and testing of the Expectancy-Valence and Prospect-Valence Learning models from the past 10 years or so using simulated gambling tasks, in particular the Iowa and Soochow Gambling Tasks. We highlight the issues of model generalizability and parameter consistency, and we describe findings obtained from these models in clinical populations including substance use disorders. We then suggest future directions for this research that will help to bring its utility to broader research and clinical applications.
© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Addiction; Cognitive modeling; Decision making; Expectancy-Valence model; Iowa Gambling Task; Prospect-Valence Learning model; Reward sensitivity; Soochow Gambling Task; Substance abuse

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26822353     DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.07.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  10 in total

Review 1.  Impulsivities and addictions: a multidimensional integrative framework informing assessment and interventions for substance use disorders.

Authors:  Jasmin Vassileva; Patricia J Conrod
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Challenges and promises for translating computational tools into clinical practice.

Authors:  Woo-Young Ahn; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-10-01

3.  A computational model of the Cambridge gambling task with applications to substance use disorders.

Authors:  Ricardo J Romeu; Nathaniel Haines; Woo-Young Ahn; Jerome R Busemeyer; Jasmin Vassileva
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Deciphering Age Differences in Experience-Based Decision-Making: The Role of Sleep.

Authors:  Xue-Rui Peng; Yun-Rui Liu; Dong-Qiong Fan; Xu Lei; Quan-Ying Liu; Jing Yu
Journal:  Nat Sci Sleep       Date:  2020-09-29

5.  Development of a novel computational model for the Balloon Analogue Risk Task: The Exponential-Weight Mean-Variance Model.

Authors:  Harhim Park; Jaeyeong Yang; Jasmin Vassileva; Woo-Young Ahn
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 1.387

6.  The Outcome-Representation Learning Model: A Novel Reinforcement Learning Model of the Iowa Gambling Task.

Authors:  Nathaniel Haines; Jasmin Vassileva; Woo-Young Ahn
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-10-05

7.  Evaluation of Risk Behavior in Gambling Addicted and Opioid Addicted Individuals.

Authors:  Edward J Gorzelańczyk; Piotr Walecki; Monika Błaszczyszyn; Ewa Laskowska; Aleksandra Kawala-Sterniuk
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Using Methods From Computational Decision-making to Predict Nonadherence to Fitness Goals: Protocol for an Observational Study.

Authors:  Marie McCarthy; Lili Zhang; Greta Monacelli; Tomas Ward
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-11-26

9.  Changes in Loss Sensitivity During Treatment in Concurrent Disorders Inpatients: A Computational Model Approach to Assessing Risky Decision-Making.

Authors:  Stefanie Todesco; Thomas Chao; Laura Schmid; Karina A Thiessen; Christian G Schütz
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Testing the factor structure underlying behavior using joint cognitive models: Impulsivity in delay discounting and Cambridge gambling tasks.

Authors:  Peter D Kvam; Ricardo J Romeu; Brandon M Turner; Jasmin Vassileva; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2020-03-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.