Maria Lucia Calcagni1, Silvia Taralli2, Giuseppe Cardillo3, Paolo Graziano4, Pasquale Ialongo5, Maria Vittoria Mattoli2, Davide Di Franco2, Carmelo Caldarella2, Francesco Carleo3, Luca Indovina6, Alessandro Giordano2. 1. Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: ml.calcagni@rm.unicatt.it. 2. Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy. 3. Unit of Thoracic Surgery, Carlo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy. 4. Unit of Pathology, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy. 5. Unit of Radiology, Carlo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy. 6. Institute of Physics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) still represents a diagnostic challenge. The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in one of the largest samples of small SPNs, incidentally detected in subjects without a history of malignancy (nonscreening population) and undetermined at computed tomography. METHODS: One-hundred and sixty-two small (>0.8 to 1.5 cm) and, for comparison, 206 large nodules (>1.5 to 3 cm) were retrospectively evaluated. Diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose visual analysis, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and Bayesian analysis were assessed using histology or radiological follow-up as a golden standard. RESULTS: In 162 small nodules, (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose visual and ROC analyses (SUVmax = 1.3) provided 72.6% and 77.4% sensitivity and 88.0% and 82.0% specificity, respectively. The prevalence of malignancy was 38%; Bayesian analysis provided 78.8% positive and 16.0% negative posttest probabilities of malignancy. In 206 large nodules (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose visual and ROC analyses (SUVmax = 1.9) provided 89.5% and 85.1% sensitivity and 70.8% and 79.2% specificity, respectively. The prevalence of malignancy was 65%; Bayesian analysis provided 85.0% positive and 21.6% negative posttest probabilities of malignancy. In both groups, malignant nodules had a significant higher SUVmax (p < 0.0001) than benign nodules. Only in the small group, malignant nodules were significantly larger (p = 0.0054) than benign ones. CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose can be clinically relevant to rule in and rule out malignancy in undetermined small SPNs, incidentally detected in nonscreening population with intermediate pretest probability of malignancy, as well as in larger ones. Visual analysis can be considered an optimal diagnostic criterion, adequately detecting a wide range of malignant nodules with different metabolic activity.
BACKGROUND: Solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) still represents a diagnostic challenge. The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in one of the largest samples of small SPNs, incidentally detected in subjects without a history of malignancy (nonscreening population) and undetermined at computed tomography. METHODS: One-hundred and sixty-two small (>0.8 to 1.5 cm) and, for comparison, 206 large nodules (>1.5 to 3 cm) were retrospectively evaluated. Diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose visual analysis, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and Bayesian analysis were assessed using histology or radiological follow-up as a golden standard. RESULTS: In 162 small nodules, (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose visual and ROC analyses (SUVmax = 1.3) provided 72.6% and 77.4% sensitivity and 88.0% and 82.0% specificity, respectively. The prevalence of malignancy was 38%; Bayesian analysis provided 78.8% positive and 16.0% negative posttest probabilities of malignancy. In 206 large nodules (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose visual and ROC analyses (SUVmax = 1.9) provided 89.5% and 85.1% sensitivity and 70.8% and 79.2% specificity, respectively. The prevalence of malignancy was 65%; Bayesian analysis provided 85.0% positive and 21.6% negative posttest probabilities of malignancy. In both groups, malignant nodules had a significant higher SUVmax (p < 0.0001) than benign nodules. Only in the small group, malignant nodules were significantly larger (p = 0.0054) than benign ones. CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose can be clinically relevant to rule in and rule out malignancy in undetermined small SPNs, incidentally detected in nonscreening population with intermediate pretest probability of malignancy, as well as in larger ones. Visual analysis can be considered an optimal diagnostic criterion, adequately detecting a wide range of malignant nodules with different metabolic activity.
Authors: Erica Silvestri; Valentina Scolozzi; Gaia Rizzo; Luca Indovina; Marco Castellaro; Maria Vittoria Mattoli; Paolo Graziano; Giuseppe Cardillo; Alessandra Bertoldo; Maria Lucia Calcagni Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 3.138