Literature DB >> 26822184

Sample Size in Factor Analysis: The Role of Model Error.

R C MacCallum, K F Widaman, K J Preacher, S Hong.   

Abstract

This article examines effects of sample size and other design features on correspondence between factors obtained from analysis of sample data and those present in the population from which the samples were drawn. We extend earlier work on this question by examining these phenomena in the situation in which the common factor model does not hold exactly in the population. We present a theoretical framework for representing such lack of fit and examine its implications in the population and sample. Based on this approach we hypothesize that lack of fit of the model in the population will not, on the average, influence recovery of population factors in analysis of sample data, regardless of degree of model error and regardless of sample size. Rather, such recovery will be affected only by phenomena related to sampling error which have been studied previously. These hypotheses are investigated and verified in two sampling studies, one using artificial data and one using empirical data.

Year:  2001        PMID: 26822184     DOI: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3604_06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  86 in total

1.  Clinical differences among mild cognitive impairment subtypes in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Jennifer G Goldman; Holly Weis; Glenn Stebbins; Bryan Bernard; Christopher G Goetz
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 10.338

2.  The Trapeziometacarpal Arthrosis Symptoms and Disability Questionnaire: Development and Preliminary Validation.

Authors:  Stéphanie J E Becker; Teun Teunis; David Ring; Ana-Maria Vranceanu
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-02-03

3.  Psychometric properties of the Body Esteem Scale for Adolescents and Adults in an early adolescent sample.

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Rita D DeBate; Rheanna N Ata; J Kevin Thompson
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.652

4.  Psychometric Evaluation of PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures in a Longitudinal Population-Based Cohort of Men With Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Mian Wang; Kevin Weinfurt; Kathryn E Flynn; Deborah S Usinger; Ronald C Chen
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in developmental disability psychological research.

Authors:  Megan Norris; Luc Lecavalier
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2009-07-17

6.  Subgrouping Autism Based on Symptom Severity Leads to Differences in the Degree of Convergence Between Core Feature Domains.

Authors:  Allison Whitten; Kathryn E Unruh; Robin L Shafer; James W Bodfish
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2018-06

7.  Advances in Modeling Model Discrepancy: Comment on Wu and Browne (2015).

Authors:  Robert C MacCallum; Anthony O'Hagan
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  Why aren't they happy? An analysis of end-user satisfaction with Electronic health records.

Authors:  Prasad Unni; Catherine Staes; Howard Weeks; Heidi Kramer; Damion Borbolla; Stacey Slager; Teresa Taft; Valliammai Chidambaram; Charlene Weir
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

9.  Assessing the impact of the public nutrition information environment: Adapting the cancer information overload scale to measure diet information overload.

Authors:  Steven Ramondt; A Susana Ramírez
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-07-26

10.  Molecular imaging of serotonin degeneration in mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Gwenn S Smith; Frederick S Barrett; Jin Hui Joo; Najlla Nassery; Alena Savonenko; Devin J Sodums; Christopher M Marano; Cynthia A Munro; Jason Brandt; Michael A Kraut; Yun Zhou; Dean F Wong; Clifford I Workman
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 5.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.