Literature DB >> 26821830

Why Is MP2-Water "Cooler" and "Denser" than DFT-Water?

Soohaeng Yoo Willow1, Xiao Cheng Zeng2, Sotiris S Xantheas3, Kwang S Kim4, So Hirata1.   

Abstract

Density functional theory (DFT) with a dispersionless generalized gradient approximation (GGA) needs much higher temperature and pressure than the ambient conditions to maintain water in the liquid phase at the correct (1 g/cm(3)) density during first-principles simulations. Conversely, ab initio second-order many-body perturbation (MP2) calculations of liquid water require lower temperature and pressure than DFT/GGA to keep water liquid. Here we present a unifying explanation of these trends derived from classical water simulations using a polarizable force field with different sets of parameters. We show that the different temperatures and pressures between DFT/GGA and MP2 at which the simulated water displays the experimentally observed liquid structure under the ambient conditions can be largely explained by their differences in polarizability and dispersion interaction, respectively. In DFT/GGA, the polarizability and thus the induced dipole moments and the hydrogen-bond strength are all overestimated. This hinders the rotational motion of molecules and requires a higher temperature for DFT-water to be liquid. MP2 gives a stronger dispersion interaction and thus shorter intermolecular distances than dispersionless DFT/GGA, which is why MP2-water is denser than DFT-water under the same external pressure.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 26821830     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett        ISSN: 1948-7185            Impact factor:   6.475


  9 in total

1.  Performance of wave function and density functional methods for water hydrogen bond spin-spin coupling constants.

Authors:  J M García de la Vega; S Omar; J San Fabián
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  On the polarization of ligands by proteins.

Authors:  Soohaeng Yoo Willow; Bing Xie; Jason Lawrence; Robert S Eisenberg; David D L Minh
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.676

3.  Water wettability of graphene: interplay between the interfacial water structure and the electronic structure.

Authors:  Jian Liu; Chia-Yun Lai; Yu-Yang Zhang; Matteo Chiesa; Sokrates T Pantelides
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.036

4.  Chemistry with semi-classical electrons: reaction trajectories auto-generated by sub-atomistic force fields.

Authors:  Chen Bai; Seyit Kale; Judith Herzfeld
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 9.825

5.  Hydrogen-bond structure dynamics in bulk water: insights from ab initio simulations with coupled cluster theory.

Authors:  Jinfeng Liu; Xiao He; John Z H Zhang; Lian-Wen Qi
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 9.825

6.  Correlated dynamics in aqueous proton diffusion.

Authors:  Sean A Fischer; Brett I Dunlap; Daniel Gunlycke
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 9.825

Review 7.  Modeling Molecular Interactions in Water: From Pairwise to Many-Body Potential Energy Functions.

Authors:  Gerardo Andrés Cisneros; Kjartan Thor Wikfeldt; Lars Ojamäe; Jibao Lu; Yao Xu; Hedieh Torabifard; Albert P Bartók; Gábor Csányi; Valeria Molinero; Francesco Paesani
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  A Comparison of QM/MM Simulations with and without the Drude Oscillator Model Based on Hydration Free Energies of Simple Solutes.

Authors:  Gerhard König; Frank C Pickard; Jing Huang; Walter Thiel; Alexander D MacKerell; Bernard R Brooks; Darrin M York
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  A FFLUX Water Model: Flexible, Polarizable and with a Multipolar Description of Electrostatics.

Authors:  Zak E Hughes; Emmanuel Ren; Joseph C R Thacker; Benjamin C B Symons; Arnaldo F Silva; Paul L A Popelier
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.376

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.