Cheng-Ta Li1,2, Mu-Hong Chen1,2, Wei-Chen Lin1,2, Chen-Jee Hong1,2, Bang-Hung Yang3, Ren-Shyan Liu3, Pei-Chi Tu1,2, Tung-Ping Su1,2,4. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, 112, Taiwan. 2. Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, 112, Taiwan. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 4. Institute of Brain Science, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, 112, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Low-dose ketamine has been found to have robust and rapid antidepressant effects. A hypoactive prefrontal cortex (PFC) and a hyperactive amygdala have been suggested to be associated with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, it is unclear whether the rapid antidepressant mechanisms of ketamine on TRD involve changes in glutamatergic neurotransmission in the PFC and the amygdala. METHODS: A group of 48 TRD patients were recruited and equally randomized into three groups (A: 0.5 kg/mg-ketamine; B: 0.2 kg/mg-ketamine; and C: normal saline [NS]). Standardized uptake values (SUV) of glucose metabolism measured by (18) F-FDG positron-emission-tomography before and immediately after a 40-min ketamine or NS infusion were used for subsequent region-of-interest (ROI) analyses (a priori regions: PFC and amygdala) and whole-brain voxel-wise analyses and were correlated with antidepressant responses, as defined by the Hamilton depression rating scale score. The (18) F-FDG signals were used as a proxy measure of glutamate neurotransmission. RESULTS: The ROI analysis indicated that Group A and Group B, but not Group C, had increases in the SUV of the PFC (group-by-time interaction: F = 7.373, P = 0.002), whereas decreases in the SUV of the amygdala were observed in all three groups (main effect of time, P < 0.001). The voxel-wise analysis further confirmed a significant group effect on the PFC (corrected for family-wise errors, P < 0.05; post hoc analysis: Group A<Group C, Group B<Group C). The SUV differences in the PFC predicted the antidepressant responses at 40 and 240 min post-treatment. The PFC changes did not differ between those with and without side effects. CONCLUSION:Ketamine's rapid antidepressant effects involved the facilitation of glutamatergic neurotransmission in the PFC.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Low-dose ketamine has been found to have robust and rapid antidepressant effects. A hypoactive prefrontal cortex (PFC) and a hyperactive amygdala have been suggested to be associated with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, it is unclear whether the rapid antidepressant mechanisms of ketamine on TRD involve changes in glutamatergic neurotransmission in the PFC and the amygdala. METHODS: A group of 48 TRD patients were recruited and equally randomized into three groups (A: 0.5 kg/mg-ketamine; B: 0.2 kg/mg-ketamine; and C: normal saline [NS]). Standardized uptake values (SUV) of glucose metabolism measured by (18) F-FDG positron-emission-tomography before and immediately after a 40-min ketamine or NS infusion were used for subsequent region-of-interest (ROI) analyses (a priori regions: PFC and amygdala) and whole-brain voxel-wise analyses and were correlated with antidepressant responses, as defined by the Hamilton depression rating scale score. The (18) F-FDG signals were used as a proxy measure of glutamate neurotransmission. RESULTS: The ROI analysis indicated that Group A and Group B, but not Group C, had increases in the SUV of the PFC (group-by-time interaction: F = 7.373, P = 0.002), whereas decreases in the SUV of the amygdala were observed in all three groups (main effect of time, P < 0.001). The voxel-wise analysis further confirmed a significant group effect on the PFC (corrected for family-wise errors, P < 0.05; post hoc analysis: Group A<Group C, Group B<Group C). The SUV differences in the PFC predicted the antidepressant responses at 40 and 240 min post-treatment. The PFC changes did not differ between those with and without side effects. CONCLUSION:Ketamine's rapid antidepressant effects involved the facilitation of glutamatergic neurotransmission in the PFC.
Authors: Carlos A Zarate; Jaskaran B Singh; Paul J Carlson; Nancy E Brutsche; Rezvan Ameli; David A Luckenbaugh; Dennis S Charney; Husseini K Manji Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2006-08
Authors: J Hirvonen; R S Goodwin; C-T Li; G E Terry; S S Zoghbi; C Morse; V W Pike; N D Volkow; M A Huestis; R B Innis Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2011-07-12 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Natalie Katalinic; Rosalyn Lai; Andrew Somogyi; Philip B Mitchell; Paul Glue; Colleen K Loo Journal: Aust N Z J Psychiatry Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 5.744
Authors: Panos Zanos; Ruin Moaddel; Patrick J Morris; Lace M Riggs; Jaclyn N Highland; Polymnia Georgiou; Edna F R Pereira; Edson X Albuquerque; Craig J Thomas; Carlos A Zarate; Todd D Gould Journal: Pharmacol Rev Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 25.468
Authors: Ricardo P Garay; Carlos A Zarate; Thomas Charpeaud; Leslie Citrome; Christoph U Correll; Ahcène Hameg; Pierre-Michel Llorca Journal: Expert Rev Neurother Date: 2017-01-29 Impact factor: 4.618
Authors: Samuel T Wilkinson; Paul E Holtzheimer; Shan Gao; David S Kirwin; Rebecca B Price Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2018-09-20 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Marc S Lener; Mark J Niciu; Elizabeth D Ballard; Minkyung Park; Lawrence T Park; Allison C Nugent; Carlos A Zarate Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 13.382