Saori Ogawa1, Fuminori Moriyasu1, Keiko Yoshida2, Hisashi Oshiro3, Mayumi Kojima1, Takatomo Sano1, Yoshihiro Furuichi1, Yoshiyuki Kobayashi1, Ikuo Nakamura1, Katsutoshi Sugimoto4. 1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Tozan Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 3. Department of Anatomic Pathology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan. 4. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan. sugimoto@tokyo-med.ac.jp.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate two methods of determining liver stiffness in rats with various degrees of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis induced by a methionine- and choline-deficient (MCD) diet by comparing each finding with reference to histopathological liver findings. METHODS: Twenty male Wister rats were fed an MCD diet for up to 32 weeks, and four were fed a normal diet. Ultrasound-based shear wave elastography (SWE) and mechanical compression testing using an Instron Universal Testing machine were performed on each rat at designated time points. After each examination, liver histopathology was analyzed to evaluate the degrees of steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis based on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score, and each finding was compared with reference to liver histopathologic findings. RESULTS: Median liver stiffness values measured using SWE showed a stepwise increase with increasing histological inflammation score (P = 0.002), hepatic fibrosis stage (P = 0.029), ballooning score (P = 0.012), and steatosis grade (P = 0.030). Median liver stiffness measured using an Instron machine showed a stepwise increase only with increasing histological fibrosis stage (P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Degree of liver stiffness measured by SWE and the Instron machine differed. SWE reflected mainly inflammation, whereas Instron machine-derived values primarily reflected fibrosis. This is the main source of discrepancies between measurements made with these two modalities.
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate two methods of determining liver stiffness in rats with various degrees of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis induced by a methionine- and choline-deficient (MCD) diet by comparing each finding with reference to histopathological liver findings. METHODS: Twenty male Wister rats were fed an MCD diet for up to 32 weeks, and four were fed a normal diet. Ultrasound-based shear wave elastography (SWE) and mechanical compression testing using an Instron Universal Testing machine were performed on each rat at designated time points. After each examination, liver histopathology was analyzed to evaluate the degrees of steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis based on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score, and each finding was compared with reference to liver histopathologic findings. RESULTS: Median liver stiffness values measured using SWE showed a stepwise increase with increasing histological inflammation score (P = 0.002), hepatic fibrosis stage (P = 0.029), ballooning score (P = 0.012), and steatosis grade (P = 0.030). Median liver stiffness measured using an Instron machine showed a stepwise increase only with increasing histological fibrosis stage (P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Degree of liver stiffness measured by SWE and the Instron machine differed. SWE reflected mainly inflammation, whereas Instron machine-derived values primarily reflected fibrosis. This is the main source of discrepancies between measurements made with these two modalities.
Authors: Anthony E Samir; Manish Dhyani; Abhinav Vij; Atul K Bhan; Elkan F Halpern; Jorge Méndez-Navarro; Kathleen E Corey; Raymond T Chung Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Mark L Palmeri; Michael H Wang; Ned C Rouze; Manal F Abdelmalek; Cynthia D Guy; Barry Moser; Anna Mae Diehl; Kathryn R Nightingale Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2011-01-21 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: David E Kleiner; Elizabeth M Brunt; Mark Van Natta; Cynthia Behling; Melissa J Contos; Oscar W Cummings; Linda D Ferrell; Yao-Chang Liu; Michael S Torbenson; Aynur Unalp-Arida; Matthew Yeh; Arthur J McCullough; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Ziying Yin; Matthew C Murphy; Jiahui Li; Kevin J Glaser; Amy S Mauer; Taofic Mounajjed; Terry M Therneau; Heshan Liu; Harmeet Malhi; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman; Meng Yin Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Arinc Ozturk; Ramin Mohammadi; Theodore T Pierce; Sagar Kamarthi; Manish Dhyani; Joseph R Grajo; Kathleen E Corey; Raymond T Chung; Atul K Bhan; Jagpreet Chhatwal; Anthony E Samir Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2020-01-29 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Mateusz Cieśluk; Katarzyna Pogoda; Piotr Deptuła; Paulina Werel; Alina Kułakowska; Jan Kochanowicz; Zenon Mariak; Tomasz Łysoń; Joanna Reszeć; Robert Bucki Journal: Int J Nanomedicine Date: 2020-10-06
Authors: Tomasz J Czernuszewicz; Adam M Aji; Christopher J Moore; Stephanie A Montgomery; Brian Velasco; Gabriela Torres; Keerthi S Anand; Kennita A Johnson; Allison M Deal; Dženan Zukić; Matthew McCormick; Bernd Schnabl; Caterina M Gallippi; Paul A Dayton; Ryan C Gessner Journal: Hepatol Commun Date: 2022-02-24