| Literature DB >> 26821039 |
Samuel Obiri1,2, Precious A D Mattah3, Memuna M Mattah4, Frederick A Armah5, Shiloh Osae6, Sam Adu-kumi7, Philip O Yeboah8.
Abstract
Gold mining has played an important role in Ghana's economy, however the negative environmental and socio-economic effects on the host communities associated with gold mining have overshadowed these economic gains. It is within this context that this paper assessed in an integrated manner the environmental and socio-economic impacts of artisanal gold mining in the Tarkwa Nsuaem Municipality from a natural and social science perspective. The natural science group collected 200 random samples on bi-weekly basis between January to October 2013 from water bodies in the study area for analysis in line with methods outlined by the American Water Works Association, while the social science team interviewed 250 residents randomly selected for interviews on socio-economic issues associated with mining. Data from the socio-economic survey was analyzed using logistic regression with SPSS version 17. The results of the natural science investigation revealed that the levels of heavy metals in water samples from the study area in most cases exceeded GS 175-1/WHO permissible guideline values, which are in tandem with the results of inhabitants' perceptions of water quality survey (as 83% of the respondents are of the view that water bodies in the study area are polluted). This calls for cost-benefits analysis of mining before new mining leases are granted by the relevant authorities.Entities:
Keywords: Tarkwa Municipality; artisanal gold mining; heavy metal; integrated assessment; livelihood and economic issues; mining impact; risk perception; social issues; water quality
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26821039 PMCID: PMC4772180 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13020160
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Map of the study area.
Socioeconomic and environmental variables of the perception study, showing questions asked and answers provided by the 250 households.
| Socio-Economic Characteristics and Their Content | Category | % of the 250 Respondents |
|---|---|---|
| Independent variables | ||
| Gender | Male | 51 |
| Age | 20–30 years | 34 |
| 31–40 years | 18.5 | |
| 41–50 years | 15 | |
| 51–60 years | 17.5 | |
| >60 years | 15 | |
| Education | No formal education | 39.6 |
| Junior High School | 29 | |
| Secondary | 18 | |
| Diploma | 5 | |
| University education | 3.4 | |
| Household income per day before mining | <$1 a day | 52 |
| >$1 a day | 48 | |
| Household income per day after advent of mining | <$1 a day | 62 |
| >$1 a day | 38 | |
| Current employment status | Unemployed | 62 |
| Employed | 22.5 | |
| Retired | 15.5 | |
| Yes vrs No | 67 | |
| Change in colour and smell of water bodies | Deteriorated | 54 |
| Unchanged | 34.5 | |
| Improved | 11.5 | |
| Drinking water quality | Bad | 83 |
| Fair | 12 | |
| Good | 5 | |
| Taste of drinking water | ||
| Likely to have disease due to drinking water | Yes vrs No | 86.5 |
| Water pollution mentioned as a major environmental problem due to mining | Yes vrs No | 83 |
| Water pollution mentioned as a potential health risk | Yes vrs No | 77 |
| Surface mining pollutes water bodies | Yes vrs No | 68 |
| If surface mining operations stops water pollution in the community would cease | Yes vrs No | 68 |
| Surface mining deprives residents of mining communities their farmlands for the farm | Yes vrs No | 90 |
| Loss of farmlands means loss of livelihoods | Highly significant | 87 |
| Not significant | 13 | |
| Degree of mining induced pollution of water bodies | Highly polluted | 86 |
| Not highly polluted | 14 | |
| Degree of mining induced drinking water pollution | Polluted | 84 |
| Not polluted | 16 | |
| Stoppage of surface mining would improve the livelihoods of residents | Yes vrs No | 83.5 |
Mean concentrations (μg/L) of heavy metals in filtered water samples from the study area. Data includes the minimum and maximum values from each sampling site. GSA-175A/WHO guideline for drinking water is shown for reference.
| Sampling Point | As (μg/L) | Mn (μg/L) | Pb (μg/L) | Cd (μg/L) | Hg (μg/L) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Min–Max | Mean (SD) | Min–Max | Mean (SD) | Min–Max | Mean (SD) | Min–Max | Mean (SD) | Min–Max | |
| River Achofe | 15–2851 | 124–580 | 10–28 | 17–32 | <10–64 | |||||
| River Agonaben | 14–120 | 234 (54.4) | 36–300 | 25–200 | 19–974 | <10–94 | ||||
| River Adeyie | 43–248 | 222 (35.1) | 100–313 | 19–134 | 115–341 | <10–120 | ||||
| River Bremansu | <10–140 | 259 (51.6) | 151–451 | 13–214 | 10–145 | <10–154 | ||||
| River Subri | 100–700 | 53 (24.7) | 19–133 | <10–80 | 134–329 | 25–94 | ||||
| River Asuobenkasa | 43–248 | 191 (38.1) | 79–313 | 30–226 | 47–420 | 19–520 | ||||
| River Asuman | 10–40 | 26 (11.9) | <10–74 | 40–127 | <10–44 | 74 -480 | ||||
| Borehole at Abekoase | 18–24.5 | 103.2 (23.3) | 50–147 | 10–140 | 10–241 | 10–42 | ||||
| River Huni | 54–101 | 57.7 (24.7) | 19–150 | 10–221 | <10–109 | 100–520 | ||||
| River Ateberebe | 125–300 | 31 (7.01) | 12–60 | <10–329 | 21–341 | <10–127 | ||||
| GS 175-1/WHO Guideline values | 10 | 400 | 10 | 3 | 10 | |||||
Samples were collected from 10 sampling sites in TNMA on bi-weekly basis (over ten months; i.e., January to October), these concentrations are the means; SD represents standard deviation. Bold figures exceeded the GS 175-1/WHO permissible guideline values [24].
Figure 2A graph comparing the levels of heavy metals in water samples from the study area with GS 175—1/WHO Permissible guideline values.
Descriptive statistics for physic-chemical parameter for water samples from the study area.
| Parameter | Range | Mean | Standard Deviation | GS 175/1-WHO Guideline Values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 5.59–7.45 | 6.43 | 0.195 | 6.5–8.5 |
| Turbidity | 0.60–8.94 | 1.746 | 2.071 | 5 |
| Colour | 2.500–12.00 | 5.900 | 2.859 | 15 |
| TDS | 17.2–219.00 | 79.23 | 43.58 | 1000 |
| Sodium | 1.80–191.0 | 34.76 | 33.52 | 200 |
| Magnesium | 0.80–144.0 | 47.11 | 35.76 | 150 |
| Calcium | 0.50–112.0 | 27.68 | 25.76 | 200 |
| Potassium | 1.40–23.80 | 6.896 | 5.058 | 30 |
| Bicarbonate | 1.00–95.00 | 13.94 | 23.74 | 0.3 |
| Sulphate | 1.30–88.0 | 17.69 | 23.04 | 250 |
| Chloride | 1.50–50.0 | 7.923 | 9.514 | 250 |
| Nitrate-Nitrogen | 0.013–9.72 | 2.224 | 3.330 | 10 |
| Nitrite-Nitrogen | 0.001–0.220 | 0.0220 | 0.049 | 3 |
| E. Cond | 1.140–97.80 | 26.91 | 30.088 | |
| Alkalinity | 4.80–558 | 141.81 | 157.026 | |
| Hardness | 0.001–9.50 | 1.789 | 2.576 | |
| Phosphate | 0.001–9.50 | 1.586 | 2.645 | |
| TSS | 1.0–4.500 | 1.323 | 0.893 |
Pearson’s Product-Moment Correlation Coefficients for major ions in water samples from the study area.
| pH | Col | Turb. | TSS | TDS | Cond. | Alkalinity | Na | Mg | Ca | K | SO4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 1 | |||||||||||
| Col | −0.176 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Turb | 0.065 | 1 | ||||||||||
| TSS | 0.024 | −0.113 | 1 | |||||||||
| TDS | 0.161 | 0.095 | −0.029 | 0.175 | 1 | |||||||
| Cond | 0.176 | −0.234 | −0.038 | 0.047 | 0.147 | 1 | ||||||
| Alkalinity | −0.018 | 0.116 | −0.104 | 0.071 | 0.040 | −0.181 | 1 | |||||
| Na | 0.017 | 0.156 | −0.033 | 0.098 | −0.037 | −0.126 | 0.047 | 1 | ||||
| Mg | −0.034 | 0.065 | −0.140 | −0.128 | −0.006 | −0.158 | 0.231 | 1 | ||||
| Ca | 0.058 | 0.057 | −0.146 | 0.241 | 0.037 | 0.142 | 0.205 | 1 | ||||
| K | 0.043 | −0.067 | 0.119 | 0.016 | 0.055 | 0.064 | 0.058 | 0.091 | 1 | |||
| SO4 | 0.139 | −0.055 | −0.015 | −0.070 | −0.001 | 0.145 | 0.168 | 1 |
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed); ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficients between water quality parameters in Tarkwa Nsuaem Municipality, Ghana (n = 200).
| pH | Turb. | TDS | Cond. | As | Cd | Co | Mn | Pb | Hg | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 1 | |||||||||
| Turb | 1 | |||||||||
| TDS | −0.169 | 1 | ||||||||
| Cond | −0.182 | 1 | ||||||||
| As | 0.146 | − | − | 1 | ||||||
| Cd | 0.037 | − | − | 1 | ||||||
| Co | −0.280 | −0.038 | 0.020 | 0.016 | 0.079 | 1 | ||||
| Mn | 0.038 | 0.016 | −0.045 | −0.040 | −0.122 | 1 | ||||
| Pb | 0.091 | −0.061 | −0.057 | −0.033 | −0.134 | 1 | ||||
| Hg | 0.035 | −0.014 | −0.0156 | −0.128 | −0.003 | 0.004 | 1 |
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed); ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Figure 3A graph comparing Hg levels in water samples from ASGM sites in this study with other ASGM sites in Ghana as well as other countries with active ASGM sites [6,28,29,30,32,33,34,35,36,37].
Results of the logistic regression analysis.
| Perception of Water Quality (Model) | Predictors | Category | Β | Odds Ratios | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Highly polluted water bodies | Education | No formal education | 3.12 | 1.21 | 4.46 |
| Junior High School | 0.92 | 0.14 | 2.51 | ||
| Senior High School | 0.78 | 0.14 | 2.17 | ||
| Diploma | 0.23 | 0.72 | 1.25 | ||
| University degree | 0.04 | 0.94 | 1.25 | ||
| Household income | Less than $1 dollar a day | 1.82 | 0.16 | 2.17 | |
| Taste of drinking water | Deteriorated water quality | 1.93 | 0.02 | 6.92 | |
| Familiarity environmental problem | If mining activities continues, water bodies would be polluted | 1.63 | 0.010 | 5.97 | |
| Stoppage of surface mining improves livelihood of residents of mining communities | Education | No formal education | 1.33 | 0.052 | 3.79 |
| Junior High School | 1.18 | 0.009 | 3.25 | ||
| Senior High School | 0.04 | 0.840 | 1.04 | ||
| Diploma | 0.03 | 0.941 | 1.01 | ||
| University degree | 0.04 | 0.840 | 1.04 | ||
| Household income | Less than $1 a day vrs more | 1.63 | 0.003 | 5.11 |