Literature DB >> 26820991

Scope for genetic rescue of an endangered subspecies though re-establishing natural gene flow with another subspecies.

Katherine A Harrisson1, Alexandra Pavlova1, Anders Gonçalves da Silva1,2, Rebecca Rose1, James K Bull1, Melanie L Lancaster3, Neil Murray4, Bruce Quin5, Peter Menkhorst6, Michael J L Magrath7, Paul Sunnucks1.   

Abstract

Genetic diversity is positively linked to the viability and evolutionary potential of species but is often compromised in threatened taxa. Genetic rescue by gene flow from a more diverse or differentiated source population of the same species can be an effective strategy for alleviating inbreeding depression and boosting evolutionary potential. The helmeted honeyeater Lichenostomus melanops cassidix is a critically endangered subspecies of the common yellow-tufted honeyeater. Cassidix has declined to a single wild population of ~130 birds, despite being subject to intensive population management over recent decades. We assessed changes in microsatellite diversity in cassidix over the last four decades and used population viability analysis to explore whether genetic rescue through hybridization with the neighbouring Lichenostomus melanops gippslandicus subspecies constitutes a viable conservation strategy. The contemporary cassidix population is characterized by low genetic diversity and effective population size (N(e) < 50), suggesting it is vulnerable to inbreeding depression and will have limited capacity to evolve to changing environments. We find that gene flow from gippslandicus to cassidix has declined substantially relative to pre-1990 levels and argue that natural levels of gene flow between the two subspecies should be restored. Allowing gene flow (~4 migrants per generation) from gippslandicus into cassidix (i.e. genetic rescue), in combination with continued annual release of captive-bred cassidix (i.e. demographic rescue), should lead to positive demographic and genetic outcomes. Although we consider the risk of outbreeding depression to be low, we recommend that genetic rescue be managed within the context of the captive breeding programme, with monitoring of outcomes.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genetic rescue; genetic restoration; helmeted honeyeater; population viability; vortex; yellow-tufted honeyeater

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26820991     DOI: 10.1111/mec.13547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  4 in total

1.  Severe consequences of habitat fragmentation on genetic diversity of an endangered Australian freshwater fish: A call for assisted gene flow.

Authors:  Alexandra Pavlova; Luciano B Beheregaray; Rhys Coleman; Dean Gilligan; Katherine A Harrisson; Brett A Ingram; Joanne Kearns; Annika M Lamb; Mark Lintermans; Jarod Lyon; Thuy T T Nguyen; Minami Sasaki; Zeb Tonkin; Jian D L Yen; Paul Sunnucks
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 5.183

2.  The active spread of adaptive variation for reef resilience.

Authors:  Kate M Quigley; Line K Bay; Madeleine J H van Oppen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Chromosome-length genome assembly and linkage map of a critically endangered Australian bird: the helmeted honeyeater.

Authors:  Diana A Robledo-Ruiz; Han Ming Gan; Parwinder Kaur; Olga Dudchenko; David Weisz; Ruqayya Khan; Erez Lieberman Aiden; Ekaterina Osipova; Michael Hiller; Hernán E Morales; Michael J L Magrath; Rohan H Clarke; Paul Sunnucks; Alexandra Pavlova
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 6.524

4.  The conservation value of admixed phenotypes in a critically endangered species complex.

Authors:  Keren R Sadanandan; Gabriel W Low; Sheeraja Sridharan; Chyi Yin Gwee; Elize Y X Ng; Pramana Yuda; Dewi M Prawiradilaga; Jessica G H Lee; Anaïs Tritto; Frank E Rheindt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.