Literature DB >> 26820649

Comparative evaluation of antibody detection tests to facilitate the diagnosis of multibacillary leprosy.

Malcolm S Duthie1, Florenda M Orcullo2, Junie Abbelana2, Armi Maghanoy2, Marivic F Balagon2.   

Abstract

Despite control efforts, leprosy persists as a significant health concern in many regions. Diagnosis is achieved by a combination of clinical, histopathological, and bacteriological examinations, each of which presents a barrier to expeditious diagnosis, particularly by non-experts. Immunological investigations in research laboratories have clearly indicated that antibody detection tests could aid the diagnosis of leprosy. In this study, we detected circulating antibodies with two rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) involving immunochromatographic lateral flow platforms and one rapid ELISA system. Leprosy patients were identified with a high degree of sensitivity in each assay (over 80% in all; over 90% among cases with bacterial indices >1+), although critical differences were observed in specificity. While the specificity of CTK OnSite Leprosy Ab Rapid Test and InBios Leprosy Detect™ fast ELISA were high (96.4 and 93.7% in the general population, respectively), there was a marked reduction in OrangeLife NDO-LID® RDT (only 25.0%). As anticipated, seropositivity rates were marginally higher in contacts of leprosy patients than in endemic controls. Although we observed a slight drop in test band intensity when blood, rather than serum, was used to develop OnSite Leprosy Ab Rapid Tests, the sensitivity and specificity of these tests was unaffected. When we contrasted test performance with clinical and bacteriological information, we found that RDT and ELISA results positively correlated with the bacteriological index. These data indicate that these assays could be a ready replacement of invasive, insensitive, and time consuming skin slit smear procedures that additionally require expert microscopic examinations. We propose that, due to their speed and point of care applicability, the RDT could be used as an initial entry point to the diagnostic protocols, with confirmation of results attained in a highly quantitative manner following serum transfer to a reference laboratory.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Leprosy; Mycobacteria; Serology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26820649     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-016-7328-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  10 in total

1.  Development of LepReact, a defined skin test for paucibacillary leprosy and low-level M. leprae infection.

Authors:  Malcolm S Duthie; Maria T Pena; Amit P Khandhar; Alessandro Picone; Zachary MacMIllen; Richard W Truman; Linda B Adams; Steven G Reed
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Combination chemoprophylaxis and immunoprophylaxis in reducing the incidence of leprosy.

Authors:  Malcolm S Duthie; Marivic F Balagon
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2016-04-27

3.  Role of TEFFECTOR/MEMORY Cells, TBX21 Gene Expression and T-Cell Homing Receptor on Type 1 Reaction in Borderline Lepromatous Leprosy Patients.

Authors:  Luciana Nahar Dos Santos; Pedro Henrique Lopes da Silva; Iris Maria Peixoto Alvim; José Augusto da Costa Nery; Flávio Alves Lara; Euzenir Nunes Sarno; Danuza Esquenazi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Field-friendly serological tests for determination of M. leprae-specific antibodies.

Authors:  Anouk van Hooij; Elisa M Tjon Kon Fat; Susan J F van den Eeden; Louis Wilson; Moises Batista da Silva; Claudio G Salgado; John S Spencer; Paul L A M Corstjens; Annemieke Geluk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Mycobacterium leprae Recombinant Antigen Induces High Expression of Multifunction T Lymphocytes and Is Promising as a Specific Vaccine for Leprosy.

Authors:  Márcio Bezerra-Santos; Marise do Vale-Simon; Aline Silva Barreto; Rodrigo Anselmo Cazzaniga; Daniela Teles de Oliveira; Mônica Rueda Barrios; Alex Ricardo Ferreira; Nanci C Santos-Bio; Steven G Reed; Roque Pacheco de Almeida; Cristiane Bani Corrêa; Malcolm S Duthie; Amélia Ribeiro de Jesus
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Accuracy of rapid point-of-care serological tests for leprosy diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carmen Phang Romero; Rodolfo Castro; Pedro Emmanuel A do Brasil; Daniella R Pereira; Roberta Olmo Pinheiro; Cristiana M Toscano; Maria Regina Fernandes de Oliveira
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.743

7.  Delayed detection of leprosy cases: A systematic review of healthcare-related factors.

Authors:  Yudhy Dharmawan; Ahmad Fuady; Ida J Korfage; Jan Hendrik Richardus
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2022-09-06

8.  Quantitative lateral flow strip assays as User-Friendly Tools To Detect Biomarker Profiles For Leprosy.

Authors:  Anouk van Hooij; Elisa M Tjon Kon Fat; Renate Richardus; Susan J F van den Eeden; Louis Wilson; Claudia J de Dood; Roel Faber; Korshed Alam; Jan Hendrik Richardus; Paul L A M Corstjens; Annemieke Geluk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Evaluation of antigen-specific immune responses for leprosy diagnosis in a hyperendemic area in China.

Authors:  Xiaohua Chen; Yuan-Gang You; You-Hua Yuan; Lian Chao Yuan; Ying Zhang; Wen Yan
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2018-09-24

10.  Association between NDO-LID and PGL-1 for leprosy and class I and II human leukocyte antigen alleles in an indigenous community in Southwest Amazon.

Authors:  Stéfanie Ferreira Teles; Eliane Aparecida Silva; Rodrigo Medeiros de Souza; Jane Tomimori; Marcos Cesar Florian; Rogério Oliveira Souza; Elaine Valim Camarinha Marcos; Fabiana Covolo de Souza-Santana; Mônica Antar Gamba
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.257

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.